Center for Micro-ElectroMechanical Systems (CMEMS-UMINHO), University of Minho, Guimarães, Portugal.
Department of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering, School of Chemical Engineering, Aalto University Foundation, Espoo, Finland.
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024 Apr 10;21(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12984-024-01351-8.
A systematic review was conducted to determine the trends in devices and parameters used for brain photobiomodulation (PBM). The revised studies included clinical and cadaveric approaches, in which light stimuli were applied to the head and/or neck. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases were used for the systematic search. A total of 2133 records were screened, from which 97 were included in this review. The parameters that were extracted and analysed in each article were the device design, actuation area, actuation site, wavelength, mode of operation, power density, energy density, power output, energy per session and treatment time. To organize device information, 11 categories of devices were defined, according to their characteristics. The most used category of devices was laser handpieces, which relate to 21% of all devices, while 28% of the devices were not described. Studies for cognitive function and physiological characterisation are the most well defined ones and with more tangible results. There is a lack of consistency when reporting PBM studies, with several articles under defining the stimulation protocol, and a wide variety of parameters used for the same health conditions (e.g., Alzheimer's or Parkinson's disease) resulting in positive outcomes. Standardization for the report of these studies is warranted, as well as sham-controlled comparative studies to determine which parameters have the greatest effect on PBM treatments for different neurological conditions.
一项系统评价旨在确定用于脑光生物调节(PBM)的设备和参数的趋势。修订后的研究包括临床和尸体研究,其中将光刺激应用于头部和/或颈部。使用 PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science 和 Google Scholar 数据库进行系统搜索。共筛选出 2133 条记录,其中 97 条被纳入本综述。从每篇文章中提取和分析的参数包括设备设计、作用面积、作用部位、波长、操作模式、功率密度、能量密度、功率输出、每次治疗的能量和治疗时间。为了组织设备信息,根据其特点定义了 11 类设备。使用最多的设备类别是激光手持件,占所有设备的 21%,而 28%的设备未被描述。用于认知功能和生理特征的研究是最明确的,并且具有更具体的结果。在报告 PBM 研究时缺乏一致性,许多文章没有定义刺激方案,并且对于相同的健康状况(例如阿尔茨海默病或帕金森病)使用了各种各样的参数,从而产生了积极的结果。有必要对这些研究进行标准化报告,以及进行假手术对照比较研究,以确定哪些参数对不同神经状况的 PBM 治疗有最大影响。