Pyszczynski Tom, Lockett McKenzie, Greenberg Jeff, Solomon Sheldon
University of Colorado at Colorado Springs, Colorado Springs, CO, USA.
University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
J Humanist Psychol. 2021 Mar;61(2):173-189. doi: 10.1177/0022167820959488.
Terror management theory is focused on the role that awareness of death plays in diverse aspects of life. Here, we discuss the theory's implications for understanding the widely varying ways in which people have responded to the COVID-19 pandemic. We argue that regardless of whether one consciously believes that the virus is a major threat to life or only a minor inconvenience, fear of death plays an important role in driving one's attitudes and behavior related to the virus. We focus on the terror management theory distinction between proximal defenses, which are activated when thoughts of death are in current focal attention and are logically related to the threat at hand, and distal defenses, which are activated when thoughts of death are on the fringes of one's consciousness and entail the pursuit of meaning, personal value, and close relationships. We use this framework to discuss the many ways in which COVID-19 undermines psychological equanimity, the diverse ways people have responded to this threat, and the role of ineffective terror management in psychological distress and disorder that may emerge in response to the virus.
恐惧管理理论关注对死亡的认知在生活各个方面所起的作用。在此,我们探讨该理论对于理解人们应对新冠疫情的广泛不同方式的启示。我们认为,无论一个人是否有意识地相信病毒是对生命的重大威胁,还是仅仅是一个小麻烦,对死亡的恐惧在驱动其与病毒相关的态度和行为方面都起着重要作用。我们关注恐惧管理理论中近端防御和远端防御的区别,近端防御在死亡念头成为当前焦点关注且与手头威胁有逻辑关联时被激活,远端防御在死亡念头处于意识边缘且涉及对意义、个人价值和亲密关系的追求时被激活。我们运用这一框架来讨论新冠疫情破坏心理平静的多种方式、人们应对这一威胁的不同方式,以及无效的恐惧管理在因病毒可能出现的心理困扰和紊乱中所起的作用。