Mukerji Cora E, Wilson John S, Wilkinson Carol L, Krol Manon A, Nelson Charles A, Tager-Flusberg Helen
Department of Psychology, Bryn Mawr College, 101 N Merion Ave, Bryn Mawr, PA, 19010, USA.
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2025 May;55(5):1551-1564. doi: 10.1007/s10803-024-06308-3. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
Previous research links resting frontal gamma power to key developmental outcomes in young neurotypical (NT) children and infants at risk for language impairment. However, it remains unclear whether gamma power is specifically associated with language or with more general cognitive abilities among young children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The current study evaluates differences in resting frontal gamma power between young autistic and NT children and tests whether gamma power is uniquely associated with individual differences in expressive language, receptive language and non-verbal cognitive abilities in autistic and NT children. Participants included 48 autistic children and 58 age- and sex-matched NT children (ages 22-60 months). Baseline electroencephalography (EEG) recordings were acquired from each participant. Children also completed the Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL). We found that frontal gamma power at rest did not differ between autistic and NT children. Among autistic children, reduced frontal gamma power was significantly associated with both higher expressive language skills and higher non-verbal cognitive skills, controlling for age and sex. The interaction between frontal gamma power and diagnostic status no longer explained unique variance in expressive language skills after controlling for variance associated with non-verbal cognitive skills across autistic and NT children. Together, these findings suggest that reduced gamma power is associated with both better expressive language and non-verbal cognitive skills among young autistic children. Moreover, associations between high frequency neural activity and cognition are not specific to verbal abilities but reflect neural mechanisms associated with general higher-order cognitive abilities in ASD.
先前的研究将静息状态下额叶γ波功率与发育正常(NT)的幼儿以及有语言障碍风险的婴儿的关键发育结果联系起来。然而,对于被诊断为自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的幼儿,γ波功率究竟是与语言能力还是更一般的认知能力存在特定关联,仍不明确。本研究评估了自闭症幼儿与NT幼儿在静息状态下额叶γ波功率的差异,并测试γ波功率是否与自闭症幼儿和NT幼儿在表达性语言、接受性语言及非语言认知能力方面的个体差异存在独特关联。参与者包括48名自闭症儿童和58名年龄及性别匹配的NT儿童(年龄在22至60个月之间)。从每位参与者身上采集了基线脑电图(EEG)记录。儿童还完成了《马伦早期学习量表》(MSEL)。我们发现,自闭症儿童与NT儿童在静息状态下的额叶γ波功率并无差异。在自闭症儿童中,控制年龄和性别后,额叶γ波功率降低与较高的表达性语言技能和较高的非语言认知技能均显著相关。在控制了自闭症儿童和NT儿童与非语言认知技能相关的方差后,额叶γ波功率与诊断状态之间的交互作用不再能解释表达性语言技能中的独特方差。总之,这些发现表明,γ波功率降低与自闭症幼儿更好的表达性语言和非语言认知技能均相关。此外,高频神经活动与认知之间的关联并非特定于语言能力,而是反映了与ASD中一般高阶认知能力相关的神经机制。