From the Departments of Neurology (L.J.B., M.M., J.J.Y., N.J.), Population Health Science (P.A., L.J.B., N.J.), and Policy and Institute for Healthcare Delivery Science (P.A., L.J.B., N.J.), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (E.G., P.A.), New York; Departments of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Epidemiology, and the Gertrude H. Sergievsky Center (C.-S.K.), Columbia University, New York, NY; and Department of Clinical Neurosciences (N.J.), University of Calgary, AB, Canada.
Neurology. 2024 May 14;102(9):e209348. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209348. Epub 2024 Apr 12.
Medicaid beneficiaries in many American academic medical centers can receive care in a separate facility than those not covered by Medicaid. We aimed to identify possible disparities in care by evaluating the association between facility type (integrated or Medicaid-only ) and telehealth utilization in people with epilepsy.
We performed retrospective analyses using structured data from the Mount Sinai Health System electronic medical record data from January 2003 to August 2021. We identified people of all ages with epilepsy who were followed by an epileptologist after January 3, 2018, using a validated coded case definition. We evaluated associations between practice setting and telehealth utilization, an outcome measure that captures the evolving delivery of neurologic care in a post-coronavirus disease 2019 era, using multivariable logistic regression.
We identified 4,586 people with epilepsy seen by an epileptologist, including Medicaid beneficiaries in the Medicaid outpatient clinic (N = 387), Medicaid beneficiaries in the faculty practice after integration (N = 723), and non-Medicaid beneficiaries (N = 3,476). Patients not insured by Medicaid were significantly older (average age 40 years vs 29 in persons seen in Medicaid-only outpatient clinic and 28.5 in persons insured with Medicaid seen in faculty practice [ < 0.0001]). Medicaid beneficiaries were more likely to have drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE), with 51.94% of people seen in Medicaid-only outpatient clinic, 41.63% of Medicaid beneficiaries seen in faculty practice, and 37.2% of non-Medicaid beneficiaries having DRE ( < 0.0001). Medicaid outpatient clinic patients were less likely to have telehealth visits (phone or video); 81.65% of patients in the Medicaid outpatient clinic having no telehealth visits vs 71.78% of Medicaid beneficiaries in the faculty practice and 70.89% of non-Medicaid beneficiaries ( < 0.0001). In an adjusted logistic regression analysis, Medicaid beneficiaries had lower odds (0.61; 95% CI 0.46-0.81) of using teleneurology compared with all patients seen in faculty practice ( = 0.0005).
Compared with the Medicaid-only outpatient clinic, we found higher telehealth utilization in the integrated faculty practice with no difference by insurance status (Medicaid vs other). Integrated care may be associated with better health care delivery in people with epilepsy; thus, future research should examine its impact on other epilepsy-related outcomes.
许多美国学术医疗中心的医疗补助受益人可以在与非医疗补助受益人类似的设施中接受治疗。我们旨在通过评估设施类型(综合型或仅医疗补助型)与癫痫患者使用远程医疗之间的关联,来确定可能存在的护理差异。
我们使用 2003 年 1 月至 2021 年 8 月西奈山健康系统电子病历数据中的结构化数据进行回顾性分析。我们使用经过验证的编码病例定义,确定了所有年龄组在 2018 年 1 月 3 日后由癫痫专家随访的癫痫患者。我们使用多变量逻辑回归评估了实践环境与远程医疗使用之间的关联,这是一种在 2019 年冠状病毒病之后捕捉神经科护理演变的结果测量方法。
我们确定了 4586 名由癫痫专家诊治的癫痫患者,其中包括医疗补助门诊的医疗补助受益人(N=387)、整合后的教职员工诊所的医疗补助受益人(N=723)和非医疗补助受益人(N=3476)。没有医疗保险的患者年龄明显更大(平均年龄 40 岁,而仅接受医疗补助的门诊患者为 29 岁,接受教职员工诊所医疗补助的患者为 28.5 岁[<0.0001])。医疗补助受益人的耐药性癫痫(DRE)发生率更高,仅接受医疗补助的门诊患者中为 51.94%,接受教职员工诊所医疗补助的患者中为 41.63%,而非医疗补助患者中为 37.2%(<0.0001)。医疗补助门诊患者进行远程医疗就诊的可能性较小(电话或视频);仅接受医疗补助的门诊患者中 81.65%没有进行远程医疗就诊,而教职员工诊所的医疗补助受益人和非医疗补助患者中分别为 71.78%和 70.89%(<0.0001)。在调整后的逻辑回归分析中,与教职员工诊所的所有患者相比,医疗补助受益人使用远程神经病学的可能性较低(0.61;95%CI 0.46-0.81)(=0.0005)。
与仅接受医疗补助的门诊相比,我们发现综合教职员工诊所的远程医疗使用率更高,而保险状况(医疗补助与其他)没有差异。综合护理可能与癫痫患者的更好的医疗服务提供有关;因此,未来的研究应该检查其对其他与癫痫相关的结果的影响。