Nanomedicine Research and Education Center, Department of Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary.
SeroScience LCC., 1089 Budapest, Hungary.
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Mar 22;25(7):3595. doi: 10.3390/ijms25073595.
A small fraction of people vaccinated with mRNA-lipid nanoparticle (mRNA-LNP)-based COVID-19 vaccines display acute or subacute inflammatory symptoms whose mechanism has not been clarified to date. To better understand the molecular mechanism of these adverse events (AEs), here, we analyzed in vitro the vaccine-induced induction and interrelations of the following two major inflammatory processes: complement (C) activation and release of proinflammatory cytokines. Incubation of Pfizer-BioNTech's Comirnaty and Moderna's Spikevax with 75% human serum led to significant increases in C5a, sC5b-9, and Bb but not C4d, indicating C activation mainly via the alternative pathway. Control PEGylated liposomes (Doxebo) also induced C activation, but, on a weight basis, it was ~5 times less effective than that of Comirnaty. Viral or synthetic naked mRNAs had no C-activating effects. In peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) cultures supplemented with 20% autologous serum, besides C activation, Comirnaty induced the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines in the following order: IL-1α < IFN-γ < IL-1β < TNF-α < IL-6 < IL-8. Heat-inactivation of C in serum prevented a rise in IL-1α, IL-1β, and TNF-α, suggesting C-dependence of these cytokines' induction, although the C5 blocker Soliris and C1 inhibitor Berinert, which effectively inhibited C activation in both systems, did not suppress the release of any cytokines. These findings suggest that the inflammatory AEs of mRNA-LNP vaccines are due, at least in part, to stimulation of both arms of the innate immune system, whereupon C activation may be causally involved in the induction of some, but not all, inflammatory cytokines. Thus, the pharmacological attenuation of inflammatory AEs may not be achieved via monotherapy with the tested C inhibitors; efficacy may require combination therapy with different C inhibitors and/or other anti-inflammatory agents.
一小部分接种基于 mRNA-脂质纳米颗粒(mRNA-LNP)的 COVID-19 疫苗的人会出现急性或亚急性炎症症状,但至今其机制尚未阐明。为了更好地理解这些不良事件(AE)的分子机制,我们在此分析了体外疫苗诱导的两种主要炎症过程的诱导和相互关系:补体(C)激活和促炎细胞因子的释放。将辉瑞-生物科技的 Comirnaty 和莫德纳的 Spikevax 与 75%人血清孵育,导致 C5a、sC5b-9 和 Bb 显著增加,但 C4d 没有增加,表明 C 主要通过替代途径激活。对照聚乙二醇化脂质体(Doxebo)也诱导了 C 的激活,但按重量计算,其效力比 Comirnaty 低约 5 倍。病毒或合成的裸露 mRNA 没有 C 激活作用。在补充有 20%自身血清的外周血单核细胞(PBMC)培养物中,除了 C 激活外,Comirnaty 还按以下顺序诱导促炎细胞因子的分泌:IL-1α<IFN-γ<IL-1β<TNF-α<IL-6<IL-8。血清中 C 的热失活阻止了 IL-1α、IL-1β 和 TNF-α 的升高,表明这些细胞因子诱导的 C 依赖性,尽管 C5 阻断剂 Soliris 和 C1 抑制剂 Berinert 在这两种系统中都有效抑制了 C 的激活,但它们并没有抑制任何细胞因子的释放。这些发现表明,mRNA-LNP 疫苗的炎症 AE 至少部分是由于先天免疫系统的两个分支被刺激所致,随后 C 的激活可能与一些(但不是所有)促炎细胞因子的诱导有关。因此,通过测试的 C 抑制剂的单一疗法可能无法实现炎症 AE 的药理学缓解;疗效可能需要联合使用不同的 C 抑制剂和/或其他抗炎药物进行治疗。