Diabetes Research Centre, Leicester General Hospital, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK.
HRB Clinical Research Facility & School of Public Health, University College Cork T12 WE28, Ireland.
J R Soc Med. 2024 Sep;117(9):302-317. doi: 10.1177/01410768241233109. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
Globally, there is a growing number of people who are living with multiple long-term conditions (MLTCs). Due to complex management needs, it is imperative that research consists of participants who may benefit most from interventions. It is well documented that ethnic minority groups and lower socioeconomic status (SES) groups are at an increased risk of developing MLTCs. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review was to determine the level of reporting and representation of underserved groups (ethnic minority and low SES) in intervention studies addressing MLTCs.
Systematic review. Four databases including Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, CINAHL and Scopus were searched for intervention studies from North America or Europe published between January 1990 and July 2023.
Hospital and community-based interventions. We included interventional studies focusing on improving MLTC-related outcomes.
Patients with MLTCs.
Total number of studies reporting on ethnicity and SES. Number and proportion of studies reporting by ethnic/SES group.
Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Only 4 of 13 studies (31%) recorded and reported ethnicity information. Of these four studies that reported on ethnicity, three studies consisted of primarily White participants. Ethnic minority groups were underrepresented, but one study included a majority of African American participants. Moreover, 12 of 13 studies (92%) reported on SES with income and educational level being the primary measures used. SES representation of higher deprivation groups was varied due to limited data.
For ethnicity, there was a lack of reporting, and ethnic minority groups were underrepresented in intervention studies. For SES, there was a high level of reporting but the proportion of study samples from across the spectrum of SES varied due to the variety of SES measures used. Findings highlight a need to improve the reporting and representation of ethnic minority groups and provide more detailed information for SES through using consistent measures (e.g. education, income and employment) to accurately determine the distribution of SES groups in intervention studies of people with MLTCs.
在全球范围内,患有多种慢性疾病(MLTCs)的人数不断增加。由于管理需求复杂,研究对象必须是最有可能从干预措施中受益的人群。有大量文献记录表明,少数民族群体和社会经济地位较低(SES)的群体患 MLTCs 的风险增加。因此,本系统评价的目的是确定针对 MLTCs 的干预研究中报告和代表性不足群体(少数民族和低 SES)的程度。
系统评价。检索了 Cochrane Library、MEDLINE、CINAHL 和 Scopus 四个数据库,纳入了 1990 年 1 月至 2023 年 7 月在北美或欧洲发表的针对 MLTCs 的干预研究。
医院和社区干预。我们纳入了专注于改善 MLTC 相关结局的干预研究。
患有 MLTCs 的患者。
报告种族和 SES 的研究总数。按种族/SES 群体报告的研究数量和比例。
13 项研究符合纳入标准。仅有 13 项研究中的 4 项(31%)记录和报告了种族信息。在这四项报告种族的研究中,三项研究的参与者主要为白人。少数民族群体代表性不足,但有一项研究的参与者主要为非裔美国人。此外,13 项研究中有 12 项(92%)报告了 SES,收入和教育水平是主要的衡量标准。由于数据有限,较高贫困群体的 SES 代表性存在差异。
在种族方面,报告不足,少数民族群体在干预研究中代表性不足。在 SES 方面,报告水平较高,但由于使用的 SES 衡量标准不同,研究样本在 SES 谱上的比例也存在差异。研究结果表明,需要改进对少数民族群体的报告和代表性,并通过使用一致的衡量标准(例如教育、收入和就业)来提供更详细的 SES 信息,以准确确定 MLTC 患者干预研究中 SES 群体的分布。