Venner Samantha, Maharaj Natasha, Sivasubramaniam Diane, Shepherd Stephane M
Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
School of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2023 Apr 20;31(2):189-215. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2023.2192254. eCollection 2024.
Risk assessment instruments are used to estimate risk of recidivism and aid in decision-making and treatment planning. However, many of these instruments, including the Level of Service/Risk, Need, Responsivity (LS/RNR), are validated on predominantly Western populations, and research has questioned whether the factors included in the LS/RNR adequately capture the experiences and needs of non-Western communities, including Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders. The current study aimed to canvas the opinions of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community justice workers as to the suitability of the LS/RNR for use with this population. A general qualitative methodology was adopted to gain in-depth information through the facilitation of a focus group, and data were analysed thematically. Whilst participants agreed that the LS/RNR risk factors are relevant to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander offenders, they reported that the instrument did not adequately capture relevant culturally specific considerations and made suggestions to improve the LS/RNR.
风险评估工具用于估计再犯风险,并辅助决策和治疗规划。然而,其中许多工具,包括服务/风险、需求、反应性水平(LS/RNR),主要是在西方人群中得到验证的,并且研究质疑LS/RNR中包含的因素是否充分反映了非西方社区(包括原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民)的经历和需求。当前的研究旨在探讨原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民社区司法工作者对LS/RNR适用于该人群的看法。采用了一般定性方法,通过组织焦点小组来获取深入信息,并对数据进行了主题分析。虽然参与者一致认为LS/RNR风险因素与原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民罪犯相关,但他们报告称该工具没有充分考虑相关的文化特定因素,并提出了改进LS/RNR的建议。