Suppr超能文献

原住民及托雷斯海峡岛民对法医风险评估的看法。

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander perspectives on forensic risk assessment.

作者信息

Venner Samantha, Maharaj Natasha, Sivasubramaniam Diane, Shepherd Stephane M

机构信息

Centre for Forensic Behavioural Science, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

School of Psychological Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2023 Apr 20;31(2):189-215. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2023.2192254. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Risk assessment instruments are used to estimate risk of recidivism and aid in decision-making and treatment planning. However, many of these instruments, including the Level of Service/Risk, Need, Responsivity (LS/RNR), are validated on predominantly Western populations, and research has questioned whether the factors included in the LS/RNR adequately capture the experiences and needs of non-Western communities, including Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders. The current study aimed to canvas the opinions of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community justice workers as to the suitability of the LS/RNR for use with this population. A general qualitative methodology was adopted to gain in-depth information through the facilitation of a focus group, and data were analysed thematically. Whilst participants agreed that the LS/RNR risk factors are relevant to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander offenders, they reported that the instrument did not adequately capture relevant culturally specific considerations and made suggestions to improve the LS/RNR.

摘要

风险评估工具用于估计再犯风险,并辅助决策和治疗规划。然而,其中许多工具,包括服务/风险、需求、反应性水平(LS/RNR),主要是在西方人群中得到验证的,并且研究质疑LS/RNR中包含的因素是否充分反映了非西方社区(包括原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民)的经历和需求。当前的研究旨在探讨原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民社区司法工作者对LS/RNR适用于该人群的看法。采用了一般定性方法,通过组织焦点小组来获取深入信息,并对数据进行了主题分析。虽然参与者一致认为LS/RNR风险因素与原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民罪犯相关,但他们报告称该工具没有充分考虑相关的文化特定因素,并提出了改进LS/RNR的建议。

相似文献

1
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander perspectives on forensic risk assessment.
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2023 Apr 20;31(2):189-215. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2023.2192254. eCollection 2024.
2
The cross-cultural fairness of the LS/RNR: An Australian analysis.
Law Hum Behav. 2022 Jun;46(3):214-226. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000486.

本文引用的文献

2
Finding Colour in Conformity Part II-Reflections on Structured Professional Judgement and Cross-Cultural Risk Assessment.
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2021 Jan;65(1):92-99. doi: 10.1177/0306624X20928025. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
3
Assessing violence risk with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander offenders: considerations for forensic practice.
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2018 Jun 19;25(3):452-464. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2018.1467804. eCollection 2018.
4
The impact of indigenous cultural identity and cultural engagement on violent offending.
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jul 24;18(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4603-2.
6
Are risk assessments racially biased?: Field study of the SAVRY and YLS/CMI in probation.
Psychol Assess. 2017 Jun;29(6):664-678. doi: 10.1037/pas0000445.
7
Violence risk instruments may be culturally unsafe for use with Indigenous patients.
Australas Psychiatry. 2016 Dec;24(6):565-567. doi: 10.1177/1039856216665287. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
8
Contextualising the social capital of Australian Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal men in prison.
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Oct;167:29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.08.040. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
9
Finding Color in Conformity: A Commentary on Culturally Specific Risk Factors for Violence in Australia.
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2015 Nov;59(12):1297-307. doi: 10.1177/0306624X14540492. Epub 2014 Jun 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验