Bourgeois Alyssa K, Tank Suzanne E, Floyd William C, Emelko Monica B, Amiri Fariba
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton T6G 2E9, Canada.
Department of Geography, Vancouver Island University, Nanaimo V9R 5S5, Canada.
ACS ES T Water. 2024 Mar 18;4(4):1335-1345. doi: 10.1021/acsestwater.3c00471. eCollection 2024 Apr 12.
Despite the global importance of forested watersheds as sources of drinking water, few studies have examined the effects of forestry on drinking water treatability. Relatively little is known about how the interaction between landscape variation and flow impacts source water quality and what this interaction means for drinking water treatability. To address this knowledge gap, we examined variability in sediments, dissolved organic matter, and disinfection byproduct formation potentials (DBP-FPs) across a range of flow conditions in four small watersheds with contrasting forest harvest histories and soil characteristics on Vancouver Island. Storm event-driven change in streamflow was the primary driver of water quality and DBP-FPs at our sites, with greater changes during stormflow (e.g., a 3-fold increase in dissolved organic carbon concentrations) than those across contrasting watersheds. Flow-driven changes in water quality and DBP-FPs were not significantly different across watersheds with different harvest histories; muted responses may be attributed to widespread second growth forests (i.e., recent harvesting effects may be confounded by historical harvest), forestry practices (e.g., slash burning), or soils with low organic carbon storage. This study suggests that variation in hydrology predominates over harvest history and soil characteristics to drive water quality and DBP-FPs on the east coast of Vancouver Island.
尽管森林覆盖的流域作为饮用水源具有全球重要性,但很少有研究考察林业对饮用水可处理性的影响。关于景观变化与水流之间的相互作用如何影响原水水质以及这种相互作用对饮用水可处理性意味着什么,我们所知相对较少。为了填补这一知识空白,我们研究了温哥华岛上四个具有不同森林采伐历史和土壤特征的小流域在一系列水流条件下沉积物、溶解有机物和消毒副产物生成潜力(DBP-FPs)的变异性。暴雨事件驱动的径流变化是我们研究地点水质和DBP-FPs的主要驱动因素,暴雨径流期间的变化(例如,溶解有机碳浓度增加3倍)比不同流域之间的变化更大。不同采伐历史的流域之间,水流驱动的水质和DBP-FPs变化没有显著差异;反应不明显可能归因于广泛的次生林(即近期采伐的影响可能被历史采伐所混淆)、林业实践(如 slash burning)或有机碳储量低的土壤。这项研究表明,在温哥华岛东海岸,水文变化比采伐历史和土壤特征更能主导水质和DBP-FPs。