Chong Katherine, Hickey Gordon M, Chan Hing Man, Basu Niladri
Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Centre for Indigenous Peoples Nutrition and Environment, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2024 Sep;20(5):1677-1692. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4927. Epub 2024 Apr 19.
Indigenous peoples in Canada are disproportionately exposed to environmental contaminants and may face elevated health risks related to their unique cultural, spiritual, and economic relationships with the land, including the use of traditional food systems. However, to date, institutionalized approaches to assess risks to human and ecological health from contaminants have not been well developed or implemented with Indigenous community contexts in mind. There is regulatory interest in developing new approach methods for risk assessment, and thus an opportunity to increase their relevance to Indigenous communities in which they will be ultimately applied. Therefore, we conducted an anonymous mixed-methods survey of those involved with risk assessment in Indigenous communities in Canada to: (1) understand risk assessment practice in Indigenous communities, (2) explore challenges with conventional assessment methods and compare these across sectors, and (3) gather perspectives on the development of new approaches. In all, 38 completed survey responses were received (14% response rate). Respondents were from Indigenous community environment and health offices (21% of respondents), Indigenous governments (8%), federal and provincial governments (21%), and academia (45%). Risk communication was seen as the most challenging part of risk assessment (71% responded "difficult"), and nearly all respondents agreed that time (86%), cost (76%), and resource availability (86%) were "moderate" to "serious" problems. Few respondents (16%) had heard of "new approach methods" for risk assessment, and 76% of respondents (and 100% of community-based respondents) agreed on the need to develop improved risk assessment approaches. To modernize risk assessment, respondents recommended advancing cumulative risk assessment methods, improving risk communication, and promoting Indigenous leadership and Traditional Knowledge in assessment activities. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2024;20:1677-1692. © 2024 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).
加拿大的原住民过多地暴露于环境污染物中,由于他们与土地有着独特的文化、精神和经济关系,包括使用传统食物系统,可能面临更高的健康风险。然而,迄今为止,考虑到原住民社区的背景,尚未充分制定或实施用于评估污染物对人类和生态健康风险的制度化方法。监管机构有兴趣开发新的风险评估方法,因此有机会提高这些方法与最终将应用它们的原住民社区的相关性。因此,我们对加拿大原住民社区中参与风险评估的人员进行了一项匿名的混合方法调查,以:(1)了解原住民社区的风险评估实践;(2)探索传统评估方法面临的挑战,并在不同部门之间进行比较;(3)收集对新方法开发的看法。总共收到了38份完整的调查问卷回复(回复率为14%)。受访者来自原住民社区环境与健康办公室(占受访者的21%)、原住民政府(8%)、联邦和省政府(21%)以及学术界(45%)。风险沟通被视为风险评估中最具挑战性的部分(71%的受访者回答“困难”),几乎所有受访者都认为时间(86%)、成本(76%)和资源可用性(86%)是“中等”到“严重”的问题。很少有受访者(16%)听说过风险评估的“新方法”,76%的受访者(以及100%的社区受访者)同意需要开发改进的风险评估方法。为了使风险评估现代化,受访者建议推进累积风险评估方法、改善风险沟通,并在评估活动中促进原住民领导力和传统知识。《综合环境评估与管理》2024年;20:1677 - 1692。© 2024作者。由威利期刊有限责任公司代表环境毒理学与化学学会(SETAC)出版的《综合环境评估与管理》