Sports and Physical Activity Research Group, Institute for Research and Innovation in Life and Health Sciences in Central Catalonia (Iris-CC) and University of Vic - Central University of Catalonia (UVic-UCC), Vic, Spain.
Sports and Physical Activity Research Group, Sport and Physical Activity Studies Centre, University of Vic - Central University of Catalonia (UVic-UCC), Vic, Spain.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 Apr 19;21(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01595-6.
Digital interventions are potential tools for reducing and limiting occupational sedentary behaviour (SB) in sedentary desk-based jobs. Given the harmful effects of sitting too much and sitting for too long while working, the aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the effectiveness of workplace interventions, that incorporated digital elements, to reduce the time spent in SB in office workers.
Randomised control trials that evaluated the implementation of workplace interventions that incorporated digital elements for breaking and limiting SB among desk-based jobs were identified by literature searches in six electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO and PEDro) published up to 2023. Studies were included if total and/or occupational SB were assessed. Only studies that reported pre- and postintervention mean differences and standard deviations or standard errors for both intervention arms were used for the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5 (RevMan 5; Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK). Risk of bias was assessed using the Standard Quality Assessment Criteria for Evaluating Primary Research Papers from a Variety of Fields QUALSYST tool.
Nineteen studies were included in the systematic review. The most employed digital elements were information delivery and mediated organisational support and social influences. Multicomponent, information, and counselling interventions measuring total and/or occupational/nonoccupational SB time by self-report or via device-based measures were reported. Multicomponent interventions were the most represented. Eleven studies were included in the meta-analysis, which presented a reduction of 29.9 (95% CI: -45.2, -14.5) min/8 h workday in SB (overall effect: Z = 3.81).
Multicomponent interventions, using a wide range of digital features, have demonstrated effectiveness in reducing time spent in SB at the workplace among desk-based employees. However, due to hybrid work (i.e., work in the office and home) being a customary mode of work for many employees, it is important for future studies to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of these interventions in the evolving work landscape.
The review protocol was registered in the Prospero database (CRD42022377366).
数字干预措施可能是减少和限制久坐办公人员职业性久坐行为(SB)的工具。鉴于工作时久坐和长时间久坐的危害,本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是检验纳入数字元素的工作场所干预措施在减少伏案工作者 SB 时间方面的有效性。
通过对截至 2023 年在六个电子数据库(PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus、CINAHL、PsycINFO 和 PEDro)中发表的文献进行检索,确定了评估包含数字元素的工作场所干预措施实施情况的随机对照试验,这些干预措施旨在打破和限制伏案工作者的 SB。如果评估了总 SB 和/或职业性 SB,则纳入研究。仅使用报告了干预组前后干预平均差异和标准偏差或标准误的研究进行荟萃分析。荟萃分析使用 Review Manager 5(RevMan 5;Cochrane 协作组织,英国牛津)进行。使用来自多个领域的初级研究论文质量评估标准工具(QUALSYST)评估偏倚风险。
本系统评价纳入了 19 项研究。最常用的数字元素是信息传递、中介组织支持和社会影响。报告了多组分、信息和咨询干预措施,通过自我报告或通过基于设备的措施来测量总 SB 和/或职业性/非职业性 SB 时间。多组分干预措施是最常见的。11 项研究纳入荟萃分析,结果显示 SB 时间减少 29.9(95%CI:-45.2,-14.5)min/8 h 工作日(总体效应:Z=3.81)。
使用多种数字功能的多组分干预措施已证明在减少伏案员工工作场所的 SB 时间方面具有有效性。然而,由于混合工作(即在办公室和家中工作)是许多员工的惯常工作模式,因此对于未来的研究来说,评估这些干预措施在不断变化的工作环境中的可行性和有效性非常重要。
该综述方案在 PROSPERO 数据库(CRD42022377366)中进行了注册。