Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University College of Medicine, 148 Gurodong-ro, Guro-Gu, Seoul, 08308, South Korea.
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 20;14(1):9099. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-59935-2.
To investigate the impact on the ovarian reserve after minimally invasive ovarian cystectomy using two platforms, the Da Vinci robotic system (Xi and SP) and the laparoscopic system. Patients underwent laparoscopic or Da Vinci robotic (Xi or SP) ovarian cystectomy for benign ovarian cysts between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2022 at Guro Hospital, Korea University Medical center. We measured the change of AMH values (%) = [(postAMH - preAMH)] × 100/preAMH. No significant differences in preoperative age, cyst size, estimated blood loss during surgery, hemoglobin drop, length of hospital stay, adhesion detachment rate and cyst rupture rate were observed. However, the operative time was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic group than that in the robotic group (67.78 ± 30.58 min vs. 105.17 ± 38.87 min, p < 0.001) The mean preAMH and postAMH were significantly higher with the Da Vinci robotic group than with the laparoscopic group (preAMH: 5.89 ± 4.81 ng/mL vs. 4.01 ± 3.59 ng/mL, p = 0.02, postAMH: 4.36 ± 3.31 ng/mL vs. 3.08 ± 2.60 ng/mL, p = 0.02). However, the mean ΔAMH was not significantly different between two groups. ΔAMH also did not demonstrate significant differences among the three groups; laparoscopic, Xi and SP robotic. Even in the patient groups with preAMH < 2 and diagnosed with endometriosis, the ΔAMH did not show significant differences between the laparoscopic and robotic groups. The Da Vinci robotic system is no inferior to conventional laparoscopic systems in preserving ovarian function.
为了研究使用两种平台(达芬奇机器人系统[Xi 和 SP]和腹腔镜系统)进行微创卵巢囊肿切除术对卵巢储备的影响,我们在韩国大学医疗中心的古罗医院对 2018 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 12 月 31 日期间因良性卵巢囊肿接受腹腔镜或达芬奇机器人(Xi 或 SP)卵巢囊肿切除术的患者进行了研究。我们通过测量 AMH 值的变化率[(术后 AMH-术前 AMH)×100/术前 AMH]来评估卵巢储备。两组患者的术前年龄、囊肿大小、术中估计出血量、血红蛋白下降量、住院时间、粘连分离率和囊肿破裂率无显著差异。然而,与腹腔镜组相比,机器人组的手术时间显著缩短(67.78±30.58 分钟比 105.17±38.87 分钟,p<0.001)。达芬奇机器人组的平均术前 AMH 和术后 AMH 均显著高于腹腔镜组(术前 AMH:5.89±4.81ng/mL 比 4.01±3.59ng/mL,p=0.02;术后 AMH:4.36±3.31ng/mL 比 3.08±2.60ng/mL,p=0.02)。然而,两组间的平均ΔAMH 无显著差异。三组(腹腔镜、Xi 和 SP 机器人)之间的ΔAMH 也无显著差异。即使在 AMH<2 和诊断为子宫内膜异位症的患者亚组中,腹腔镜组和机器人组之间的ΔAMH 也无显著差异。达芬奇机器人系统在保护卵巢功能方面并不逊于传统腹腔镜系统。