Suppr超能文献

经微创良性卵巢囊肿切除术(达芬奇机器人 Xi 系统和 SP 系统与腹腔镜系统)后卵巢储备的抗苗勒管激素值的变化。

Changes in anti-Müllerian hormone values for ovarian reserve after minimally invasive benign ovarian cystectomy: comparison of the Da Vinci robotic systems (Xi and SP) and the laparoscopic system.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University College of Medicine, 148 Gurodong-ro, Guro-Gu, Seoul, 08308, South Korea.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 20;14(1):9099. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-59935-2.

Abstract

To investigate the impact on the ovarian reserve after minimally invasive ovarian cystectomy using two platforms, the Da Vinci robotic system (Xi and SP) and the laparoscopic system. Patients underwent laparoscopic or Da Vinci robotic (Xi or SP) ovarian cystectomy for benign ovarian cysts between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2022 at Guro Hospital, Korea University Medical center. We measured the change of AMH values (%) = [(postAMH - preAMH)] × 100/preAMH. No significant differences in preoperative age, cyst size, estimated blood loss during surgery, hemoglobin drop, length of hospital stay, adhesion detachment rate and cyst rupture rate were observed. However, the operative time was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic group than that in the robotic group (67.78 ± 30.58 min vs. 105.17 ± 38.87 min, p < 0.001) The mean preAMH and postAMH were significantly higher with the Da Vinci robotic group than with the laparoscopic group (preAMH: 5.89 ± 4.81 ng/mL vs. 4.01 ± 3.59 ng/mL, p = 0.02, postAMH: 4.36 ± 3.31 ng/mL vs. 3.08 ± 2.60 ng/mL, p = 0.02). However, the mean ΔAMH was not significantly different between two groups. ΔAMH also did not demonstrate significant differences among the three groups; laparoscopic, Xi and SP robotic. Even in the patient groups with preAMH < 2 and diagnosed with endometriosis, the ΔAMH did not show significant differences between the laparoscopic and robotic groups. The Da Vinci robotic system is no inferior to conventional laparoscopic systems in preserving ovarian function.

摘要

为了研究使用两种平台(达芬奇机器人系统[Xi 和 SP]和腹腔镜系统)进行微创卵巢囊肿切除术对卵巢储备的影响,我们在韩国大学医疗中心的古罗医院对 2018 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 12 月 31 日期间因良性卵巢囊肿接受腹腔镜或达芬奇机器人(Xi 或 SP)卵巢囊肿切除术的患者进行了研究。我们通过测量 AMH 值的变化率[(术后 AMH-术前 AMH)×100/术前 AMH]来评估卵巢储备。两组患者的术前年龄、囊肿大小、术中估计出血量、血红蛋白下降量、住院时间、粘连分离率和囊肿破裂率无显著差异。然而,与腹腔镜组相比,机器人组的手术时间显著缩短(67.78±30.58 分钟比 105.17±38.87 分钟,p<0.001)。达芬奇机器人组的平均术前 AMH 和术后 AMH 均显著高于腹腔镜组(术前 AMH:5.89±4.81ng/mL 比 4.01±3.59ng/mL,p=0.02;术后 AMH:4.36±3.31ng/mL 比 3.08±2.60ng/mL,p=0.02)。然而,两组间的平均ΔAMH 无显著差异。三组(腹腔镜、Xi 和 SP 机器人)之间的ΔAMH 也无显著差异。即使在 AMH<2 和诊断为子宫内膜异位症的患者亚组中,腹腔镜组和机器人组之间的ΔAMH 也无显著差异。达芬奇机器人系统在保护卵巢功能方面并不逊于传统腹腔镜系统。

相似文献

2
4
Comparison of serum antimüllerian hormone levels after robotic-assisted vs. laparoscopic approach for ovarian cystectomy in endometrioma.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Jun;249:9-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.04.010. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
5
Ovarian Reserve Following Laparoscopic Ovarian Cystectomy vs Cyst Deroofing for Endometriomas.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019 Jul-Aug;26(5):877-882. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.06.022. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
6
7
Effect of laparoscopic cystectomy on ovarian reserve in patients with ovarian cyst.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 30;13:964229. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.964229. eCollection 2022.
8
What is the role of robotic surgery in ovarian cystectomy with fertility preservation?
J Robot Surg. 2023 Dec;17(6):2743-2747. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01704-w. Epub 2023 Sep 10.
9
Short-Term Impact of Laparoscopic Cystectomy on Ovarian Reserve Tests in Bilateral and Unilateral Endometriotic and Nonendometriotic Cysts.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Jul-Aug;23(5):719-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.02.018. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
10
The Optimal Time of Ovarian Reserve Recovery After Laparoscopic Unilateral Ovarian Non-Endometriotic Cystectomy.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Sep 24;12:671225. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.671225. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Evidence on Serum Anti-Müllerian Hormone Levels and Endometriosis Surgery.
J Clin Med. 2025 May 28;14(11):3772. doi: 10.3390/jcm14113772.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of laparoscopic cystectomy on ovarian reserve in patients with ovarian cyst.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 30;13:964229. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.964229. eCollection 2022.
3
The Optimal Time of Ovarian Reserve Recovery After Laparoscopic Unilateral Ovarian Non-Endometriotic Cystectomy.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Sep 24;12:671225. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.671225. eCollection 2021.
4
Obesity Fact Sheet in Korea, 2020: Prevalence of Obesity by Obesity Class from 2009 to 2018.
J Obes Metab Syndr. 2021 Jun 30;30(2):141-148. doi: 10.7570/jomes21056.
5
Testing and interpreting measures of ovarian reserve: a committee opinion.
Fertil Steril. 2020 Dec;114(6):1151-1157. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.09.134.
6
Comparison of serum antimüllerian hormone levels after robotic-assisted vs. laparoscopic approach for ovarian cystectomy in endometrioma.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Jun;249:9-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.04.010. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
7
Robotic surgery vs laparoscopic surgery in patients with diagnosis of endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
J Robot Surg. 2020 Oct;14(5):687-694. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01061-y. Epub 2020 Mar 7.
9
Effect of laparoscopic endometrioma cystectomy on anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels.
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2019 Jun;35(6):494-497. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2018.1549220. Epub 2019 Feb 7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验