Department of Pathology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
Department of Pathology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.
Am J Surg Pathol. 2024 Jul 1;48(7):790-802. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000002230. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
Endometrial somatically derived yolk sac tumors are characterized by yolk sac morphology with AFP, SALL-4, and/or Glypican-3 immunoexpression. Yolk sac marker expression, however, is not limited to tumors with overt yolk sac histology. Three hundred consecutive endometrial malignancies were assessed for immunomarkers of yolk sac differentiation. Of these, 9% expressed ≥1 yolk sac marker, including 29% of high-grade tumors. Only 3 (1%) met morphologic criteria for yolk sac differentiation; these were originally diagnosed as serous, high-grade NOS, and dedifferentiated carcinoma. Two were MMR-intact and comprised exclusively of yolk sac elements, while the dedifferentiated case was MMR deficient and had a background low-grade endometrioid carcinoma; this case also showed BRG1 loss. All 3 were INI1 intact. Nonspecific yolk sac marker expression was seen in 14 carcinosarcomas, 4 endometrioid, 2 serous, 1 clear cell, 1 dedifferentiated, 1 mixed serous/clear cell, and 1 mesonephric-like carcinoma. INI1 was intact in all cases; one showed BRG1 loss. Twenty were MMR-intact, and 4 were MMR deficient. All MMR-deficient cases with yolk sac marker expression, both with and without true yolk sac morphology, had no evidence of residual disease on follow-up, whereas 82% of MMR-intact cases developed recurrent/metastatic disease. In summary, endometrial somatically derived yolk sac tumors were rare but under-recognized. While AFP immunostaining was specific for this diagnosis, Glypican-3 and SALL-4 expression was seen in a variety of other high-grade carcinomas. INI1 loss was not associated with yolk sac morphology or immunomarker expression in the endometrium, and BRG1 loss was rare. All patients with MMR-deficient carcinomas with yolk sac immunoexpression +/- morphology were disease-free on follow-up, whereas the majority of MMR-intact cancers showed aggressive disease.
子宫内膜体腔衍生的卵黄囊肿瘤的特征是具有卵黄囊形态,免疫组化表达 AFP、SALL-4 和/或 Glypican-3。然而,卵黄囊标志物的表达不仅限于具有明显卵黄囊组织学的肿瘤。对 300 例连续的子宫内膜恶性肿瘤进行了卵黄囊分化的免疫标志物评估。其中,9%的肿瘤表达≥1 种卵黄囊标志物,包括 29%的高级别肿瘤。只有 3 例(1%)符合卵黄囊分化的形态学标准;这些最初被诊断为浆液性、高级别NOS 和去分化癌。其中 2 例 MMR 完整,仅由卵黄囊成分组成,而去分化病例 MMR 缺失,并有背景低级别子宫内膜样癌;该病例还显示 BRG1 缺失。所有 3 例均 INI1 完整。14 例癌肉瘤、4 例子宫内膜样癌、2 例浆液性癌、1 例透明细胞癌、1 例去分化癌、1 例混合性浆液性/透明细胞癌和 1 例中肾样癌中均可见非特异性卵黄囊标志物表达。所有病例的 INI1 均完整,其中 1 例 BRG1 缺失。20 例 MMR 完整,4 例 MMR 缺失。所有 MMR 缺失且具有卵黄囊标志物表达的病例,无论是否具有真正的卵黄囊形态,在随访中均无残留疾病的证据,而 82%的 MMR 完整病例则发生了复发性/转移性疾病。总之,子宫内膜体腔衍生的卵黄囊肿瘤很少见,但认识不足。虽然 AFP 免疫组化染色对该诊断具有特异性,但 Glypican-3 和 SALL-4 的表达也可见于多种其他高级别癌中。在子宫内膜中,INI1 缺失与卵黄囊形态或免疫标志物表达无关,BRG1 缺失罕见。所有具有 MMR 缺失且具有卵黄囊免疫表达+/形态的癌患者在随访中均无疾病,而大多数 MMR 完整的癌症则表现为侵袭性疾病。