Herman Chloe, Barker Bridget M, Bartelli Thais F, Chandra Vidhi, Krajmalnik-Brown Rosa, Jewell Mary, Li Le, Liao Chen, McAllister Florencia, Nirmalkar Khemlal, Xavier Joao B, Gregory Caporaso J
Pathogen and Microbiome Institute, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.
School of Informatics, Computing and Cyber Systems, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA.
ArXiv. 2024 Apr 10:arXiv:2404.07325v1.
Fecal Microbiota Transplant (FMT) is an FDA approved treatment for recurrent infections, and is being explored for other clinical applications, from alleviating digestive and neurological disorders, to priming the microbiome for cancer treatment, and restoring microbiomes impacted by cancer treatment. Quantifying the extent of engraftment following an FMT is important in determining if a recipient didn't respond because the engrafted microbiome didn't produce the desired outcomes (a successful FMT, but negative treatment outcome), or the microbiome didn't engraft (an unsuccessful FMT and negative treatment outcome). The lack of a consistent methodology for quantifying FMT engraftment extent hinders the assessment of FMT success and its relation to clinical outcomes, and presents challenges for comparing FMT results and protocols across studies. Here we review 46 studies of FMT in humans and model organisms and group their approaches for assessing the extent to which an FMT engrafts into three criteria: 1) investigates microbiome shifts following FMT engraftment using methods such as alpha diversity comparisons, beta diversity comparisons, and microbiome source tracking. 2) tracks donated microbiome features (e.g., amplicon sequence variants or species of interest) as a signal of engraftment with methods such as differential abundance testing based on the current sample collection, or tracking changes in feature abundances that have been previously identified (e.g., from FMT or disease-relevant literature). 3) examines how resistant post-FMT recipient's microbiomes are to reverting back to their baseline microbiome. Individually, these criteria each highlight a critical aspect of microbiome engraftment; investigated together, however, they provide a clearer assessment of microbiome engraftment. We discuss the pros and cons of each of these criteria, providing illustrative examples of their application. We also introduce key terminology and recommendations on how FMT studies can be analyzed for rigorous engraftment extent assessment.
粪便微生物群移植(FMT)是一种经美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准用于治疗复发性感染的疗法,目前正在探索其在其他临床应用中的潜力,包括缓解消化和神经系统疾病、为癌症治疗准备微生物群以及恢复受癌症治疗影响的微生物群。量化FMT后的植入程度对于确定接受者没有反应是因为植入的微生物群没有产生预期效果(FMT成功但治疗结果为阴性),还是微生物群没有植入(FMT失败且治疗结果为阴性)至关重要。缺乏一致的量化FMT植入程度的方法阻碍了对FMT成功与否及其与临床结果关系的评估,并给跨研究比较FMT结果和方案带来了挑战。在此,我们回顾了46项关于人类和模式生物中FMT的研究,并将它们评估FMT植入程度的方法分为三个标准:1)使用α多样性比较、β多样性比较和微生物群来源追踪等方法研究FMT植入后的微生物群变化。2)通过基于当前样本采集的差异丰度测试等方法,或追踪先前已识别的特征丰度变化(例如,来自FMT或疾病相关文献),来追踪捐赠的微生物群特征(例如,扩增子序列变体或感兴趣的物种)作为植入的信号。3)检查FMT后受体的微生物群对恢复到其基线微生物群的抗性。这些标准单独来看,每个都突出了微生物群植入的一个关键方面;然而,综合起来研究,它们能更清楚地评估微生物群的植入情况。我们讨论了每个标准的优缺点,并提供了其应用示例。我们还介绍了关键术语以及关于如何分析FMT研究以进行严格的植入程度评估的建议。