Suppr超能文献

飓风“艾玛”过后,辅助生活居民的转移和医疗保健结果。

Evacuation and Health Care Outcomes Among Assisted Living Residents After Hurricane Irma.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, University of Massachusetts, Lowell.

Center for Gerontology and Health Care Research, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Apr 1;7(4):e248572. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.8572.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Evacuation has been found to be associated with adverse outcomes among nursing home residents during hurricanes, but the outcomes for assisted living (AL) residents remain unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between evacuation and health care outcomes (ie, emergency department visits, hospitalizations, mortality, and nursing home visits) among Florida AL residents exposed to Hurricane Irma.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective cohort study using 2017 Medicare claims data. Participants were a cohort of Florida AL residents who were aged 65 years or older, enrolled in Medicare fee-for-service, and resided in 9-digit zip codes corresponding to US assisted living communities with 25 or more beds on September 10, 2017, the day of Hurricane Irma's landfall. Propensity score matching was used to match evacuated residents to those that sheltered-in-place based on resident and AL characteristics. Data were analyzed from September 2022 to February 2024.

EXPOSURE

Whether the AL community evacuated or sheltered-in-place before Hurricane Irma made landfall.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Thirty- and 90-day emergency department visits, hospitalizations, mortality, and nursing home admissions.

RESULTS

The study cohort included 25 130 Florida AL residents (mean [SD] age 81 [9] years); 3402 (13.5%) evacuated and 21 728 (86.5%) did not evacuate. The evacuated group had 2223 women (65.3%), and the group that sheltered-in-place had 14 556 women (67.0%). In the evacuated group, 42 residents (1.2%) were Black, 93 (2.7%) were Hispanic, and 3225 (94.8%) were White. In the group that sheltered in place, 490 residents (2.3%) were Black, 707 (3.3%) were Hispanic, and 20 212 (93.0%) were White. After 1:4 propensity score matching, when compared with sheltering-in-place, evacuation was associated with a 16% greater odds of emergency department visits (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01-1.33; P = .04) and 51% greater odds of nursing home visits (AOR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.14-2.00; P = .01) within 30 days of Hurricane Irma's landfall. Hospitalization and mortality did not vary significantly by evacuation status within 30 or 90 days after the landfall date.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort study of Florida AL residents, there was an increased risk of nursing home and emergency department visits within 30 days of Hurricane Irma's landfall among residents from communities that evacuated before the storm when compared with residents from communities that sheltered-in-place. The stress and disruption caused by evacuation may yield poorer immediate health outcomes after a major storm for AL residents. Therefore, the potential benefits and harms of evacuating vs sheltering-in-place must be carefully considered when developing emergency planning and response.

摘要

重要性:已发现撤离与飓风期间疗养院居民的不良后果有关,但辅助生活(AL)居民的后果仍不清楚。

目的:研究佛罗里达州在遭受飓风艾玛影响的 AL 居民中,撤离与医疗保健结果(即急诊就诊、住院、死亡和疗养院就诊)之间的关联。

设计、地点和参与者:使用 2017 年医疗保险索赔数据的回顾性队列研究。参与者是佛罗里达州年龄在 65 岁或以上、参加医疗保险按服务收费计划、并于 2017 年 9 月 10 日(飓风艾玛登陆日)居住在对应于美国辅助生活社区的 9 位邮政编码中、有 25 张或更多床位的 AL 居民的队列。根据居民和 AL 的特征,使用倾向评分匹配将撤离的居民与就地避难的居民进行匹配。数据于 2022 年 9 月至 2024 年 2 月进行分析。

暴露:辅助生活社区在飓风艾玛登陆前是否撤离或就地避难。

主要结果和措施:30 天和 90 天的急诊就诊、住院、死亡和疗养院入院。

结果:研究队列包括 25130 名佛罗里达州 AL 居民(平均[标准差]年龄 81[9]岁);3402 人(13.5%)撤离,21728 人(86.5%)未撤离。撤离组中有 2223 名女性(65.3%),就地避难组中有 14556 名女性(67.0%)。在撤离组中,有 42 名居民(1.2%)是黑人,93 名(2.7%)是西班牙裔,3225 名(94.8%)是白人。在就地避难组中,有 490 名居民(2.3%)是黑人,707 名(3.3%)是西班牙裔,20212 名(93.0%)是白人。在 1:4 倾向评分匹配后,与就地避难相比,撤离与急诊就诊的几率增加了 16%(调整后的优势比[OR],1.16;95%置信区间[CI],1.01-1.33;P=0.04),与疗养院就诊的几率增加了 51%(OR,1.51;95%CI,1.14-2.00;P=0.01)。在飓风艾玛登陆后 30 天内。在 30 天或 90 天内,住院和死亡率没有因撤离情况而显著差异。

结论和相关性:在这项针对佛罗里达州 AL 居民的队列研究中,与风暴前就地避难的社区居民相比,在飓风艾玛登陆后 30 天内,来自撤离社区的居民急诊就诊和疗养院就诊的风险增加。在一场重大风暴后,对 AL 居民来说,撤离带来的压力和破坏可能会导致他们的即时健康状况恶化。因此,在制定应急计划和应对措施时,必须仔细考虑撤离与就地避难的潜在利弊。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

6
Factors Associated With Assisted Living Facility Closure.与辅助生活设施关闭相关的因素。
Gerontologist. 2022 Feb 9;62(2):181-189. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnab105.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验