Department of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcón, Spain.
American Academy of Manipulative Therapy Fellowship in Orthopaedic Manual Physical Therapy, Montgomery, AL, USA.
Clin Rehabil. 2024 Aug;38(8):1063-1079. doi: 10.1177/02692155241249968. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of adding electrical dry needling and thrust manipulation into a multimodal program of exercise, mobilization, and ultrasound in patients with lateral elbow tendinopathy.
Randomized, single-blinded, multicenter, parallel-group trial.
Thirteen outpatient physical therapy clinics in nine different US states.
One hundred and forty-three participants (n = 143) with lateral elbow tendinopathy were randomized.
Cervical spine manipulation, extremity manipulation, and percutaneous tendon electrical dry needling plus multimodal physical therapy (n = 73) or multimodal physical therapy (n = 70) alone.
The primary outcome was elbow pain intensity and disability as measured by the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation at baseline, 1 week, 4 weeks, and 3 months. Secondary outcomes included the Numeric Pain Rating Scale, Tennis Elbow Functional Scale, Global Rating of Change, and medication intake.
The 2 × 4 analysis of covariance demonstrated that individuals with lateral elbow tendinopathy receiving electrical dry needling and thrust manipulation plus multimodal physical therapy experienced significantly greater improvements in disability (Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation: F = 19.675; P < 0.001), elbow pain intensity (Numeric Pain Rating Scale: F = 22.769; P < 0.001), and function (Tennis Elbow Function Scale: F = 13.269; P < 0.001) than those receiving multimodal physical therapy alone at 3 months. The between-group effect size was large for pain and disability (Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation: standardized mean difference = 1.13; 95% confidence interval: 0.78, 1.48) in favor of the electrical dry needling and thrust manipulation group.
The inclusion of percutaneous tendon electrical dry needling and thrust manipulation into a multimodal program of exercise, mobilization and ultrasound was more effective than multimodal physical therapy alone in individuals with lateral elbow tendinopathy. www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT03167710 May 30, 2017.
本研究旨在评估在多模式运动、松动和超声治疗方案中加入电干针和推扳手法对肘外侧肌腱病患者的影响。
随机、单盲、多中心、平行组试验。
美国九个不同州的十三个门诊物理治疗诊所。
143 名肘外侧肌腱病患者被随机分为两组(n=143)。
颈椎手法、四肢手法、经皮肌腱电干针加多模式物理治疗(n=73)或多模式物理治疗(n=70)。
主要结局指标为基线、1 周、4 周和 3 个月时采用患者自评网球肘评估量表评估的肘部疼痛强度和残疾程度。次要结局指标包括数字疼痛评分量表、网球肘功能量表、总体变化评分和药物摄入。
2×4 协方差分析显示,接受电干针和推扳手法加多模式物理治疗的肘外侧肌腱病患者在残疾程度(患者自评网球肘评估量表:F=19.675;P<0.001)、肘部疼痛强度(数字疼痛评分量表:F=22.769;P<0.001)和功能(网球肘功能量表:F=13.269;P<0.001)方面的改善明显优于接受多模式物理治疗的患者。3 个月时,电干针和推扳手法组的疼痛和残疾(患者自评网球肘评估量表:标准化均数差=1.13;95%置信区间:0.78,1.48)的组间效应较大。
在多模式运动、松动和超声治疗方案中加入经皮肌腱电干针和推扳手法比多模式物理治疗更能有效治疗肘外侧肌腱病。www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT03167710 2017 年 5 月 30 日。