Sadeghzadeh Sina, Swaminathan Akshay, Bhanot Priya, Steeman Samantha, Xu Audrey, Shah Vaibhavi, Purger David A, Buch Vivek P
Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2024 Aug;9(8):754-764. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2024.04.007. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
Deep brain stimulation has shown promise in treating individual patients with treatment-resistant depression, but larger-scale trials have been less successful. Here, we created what is, to our knowledge, the largest meta-analysis with individual patient data to date to explore whether the use of tractography enhances the efficacy of deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression.
We systematically reviewed 1823 articles, selecting 32 that contributed data from 366 patients. We stratified the individual patient data based on stimulation target and use of tractography. Using 2-way type III analysis of variance, Welch's 2-sample t tests, and mixed-effects linear regression models, we evaluated changes in depression severity 1 year (9-15 months) postoperatively and at last follow-up (4 weeks to 8 years) as assessed by depression scales.
Tractography was used for medial forebrain bundle (MFB) (n = 17 tractography/32 total), subcallosal cingulate (SCC) (n = 39 tractography/241 total), and ventral capsule/ventral striatum (n = 3 tractography/41 total) targets; it was not used for bed nucleus of stria terminalis (n = 11), lateral habenula (n = 10), and inferior thalamic peduncle (n = 1). Across all patients, tractography significantly improved mean depression scores at 1 year (p < .001) and last follow-up (p = .009). Within the target cohorts, tractography improved depression scores at 1 year for both MFB and SCC, though significance was met only at the α = 0.1 level (SCC: β = 15.8%, p = .09; MFB: β = 52.4%, p = .10). Within the tractography cohort, patients with MFB tractography showed greater improvement than patients with SCC tractography (72.42 ± 7.17% vs. 54.78 ± 4.08%) at 1 year (p = .044).
Our findings underscore the promise of tractography in deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression as a method for personalization of therapy, supporting its inclusion in future trials.
深部脑刺激在治疗难治性抑郁症的个体患者中显示出前景,但大规模试验的成效较差。在此,据我们所知,我们创建了迄今为止最大的一项包含个体患者数据的荟萃分析,以探究使用神经束成像是否能提高深部脑刺激治疗难治性抑郁症的疗效。
我们系统回顾了1823篇文章,选取了32篇提供了366例患者数据的文章。我们根据刺激靶点和神经束成像的使用情况对个体患者数据进行分层。使用双向III型方差分析、韦尔奇两样本t检验和混合效应线性回归模型,我们评估了术后1年(9 - 15个月)以及末次随访(4周 - 8年)时抑郁严重程度的变化,抑郁严重程度通过抑郁量表进行评估。
神经束成像用于内侧前脑束(MFB)(共32例中17例使用神经束成像)、胼胝体下扣带回(SCC)(共241例中39例使用神经束成像)和腹侧囊/腹侧纹状体(共41例中3例使用神经束成像)靶点;未用于终纹床核(11例)、外侧缰核(10例)和丘脑下脚(1例)。在所有患者中,神经束成像在1年时(p <.001)和末次随访时(p =.009)显著改善了平均抑郁评分。在目标队列中,神经束成像在1年时改善了MFB和SCC的抑郁评分,不过仅在α = 0.1水平达到显著性(SCC:β = 15.8%,p =.09;MFB:β = 52.4%,p =.10)。在神经束成像队列中,MFB神经束成像的患者在1年时比SCC神经束成像的患者改善更大(72.42 ± 7.17%对54.78 ± 4.08%)(p =.044)。
我们的研究结果强调了神经束成像在深部脑刺激治疗难治性抑郁症中作为一种个性化治疗方法的前景,支持将其纳入未来试验。