Suppr超能文献

统计学意义革命。

The statistical significance revolution.

机构信息

Department of Medicine and Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.

Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2024 Apr 30;8(3). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkae035.

Abstract

Statistical significance has long relied on the criterion of P less than or equal to .05. Although this threshold has generally functioned well, it has engendered some negative practices to circumvent it and been criticized as too inflexible. We concur with the statisticians and methodologists who are currently arguing for more flexibility to the P value and more reliance on the 95% confidence interval, a shift that is likely to change future practice in data analysis and interpretation for oncology.

摘要

统计显著性长期以来一直依赖于 P 值小于或等于 0.05 的标准。虽然这一阈值通常运行良好,但它也产生了一些规避它的负面做法,并被批评为过于僵化。我们同意目前正在为 P 值争取更大灵活性和更多依赖 95%置信区间的统计学家和方法学家的观点,这种转变可能会改变肿瘤学数据分析和解释的未来实践。

相似文献

1
The statistical significance revolution.
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2024 Apr 30;8(3). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkae035.
2
Statistical and clinical significance, and how to use confidence intervals to help interpret both.
Aust Crit Care. 2010 May;23(2):93-7. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2010.03.001. Epub 2010 Mar 29.
3
Investigating Subgroup Effects in Randomized Clinical Trials.
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jan 10;35(2):253-254. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.70.2217. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
4
Significance testing - are we ready yet to abandon its use?
Curr Med Res Opin. 2011 Nov;27(11):2087-90. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2011.618493. Epub 2011 Sep 14.
6
[Clinical significance vs statistical significance. How to interpret the confidence interval at 95].
Rev Alerg Mex. 2017 Oct-Dec;64(4):477-486. doi: 10.29262/ram.v64i4.334.
7
In defense of P values.
Ecology. 2014 Mar;95(3):611-7. doi: 10.1890/13-0590.1.
9
The P Value Problem in Otolaryngology: Shifting to Effect Sizes and Confidence Intervals.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Jun;156(6):978-980. doi: 10.1177/0194599816677735. Epub 2016 Nov 14.

本文引用的文献

1
In Defense of Values.
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2020 Feb 26;4(2):pkaa012. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkaa012. eCollection 2020 Apr.
2
Scientists rise up against statistical significance.
Nature. 2019 Mar;567(7748):305-307. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-00857-9.
3
The Use of "Trend" Statements to Describe Statistically Nonsignificant Results in the Oncology Literature.
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Dec 1;4(12):1778-1779. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.4524.
4
The reproducibility of research and the misinterpretation of -values.
R Soc Open Sci. 2017 Dec 6;4(12):171085. doi: 10.1098/rsos.171085. eCollection 2017 Dec.
5
Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations.
Eur J Epidemiol. 2016 Apr;31(4):337-50. doi: 10.1007/s10654-016-0149-3. Epub 2016 May 21.
6
American Society of Clinical Oncology perspective: Raising the bar for clinical trials by defining clinically meaningful outcomes.
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Apr 20;32(12):1277-80. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.53.8009. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
7
Eugenics, academic and practical.
Eugen Rev. 1935 Jul;27(2):95-100.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验