Differences in oncological benefits from second transurethral resection between white-light initial surgery and photodynamic diagnosis-guided initial surgery for primary high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between patients receiving second TUR after initial white-light transurethral resection of bladder tumor (WL-TURBT) and initial photodynamic diagnosis (PDD)-assisted TURBT.

METHODS

A total of 1007 patients were divided into four groups based on the treatment pattern: WL-TURBT with second TUR (161 patients, WL-second group) or without second TUR (540 patients, WL-alone group) and PDD-TURBT with second TUR (112 patients, PDD-second group) or without second TUR (194 patients, PDD-alone group). Oncologic outcomes (bladder cancer recurrence, progression, urothelial cancer-specific mortality) and rates of residual tumor and risk stratification of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) after second TUR were evaluated.

RESULTS

After propensity score-matching 121 patients were included each in the WL-alone and WL-second groups, and 63 patients each in the PDD-alone and PDD-second groups. In the WL group, the second TUR was significantly associated with improved progression-free (p = 0.012) and urothelial cancer-specific free survival (p = 0.011), but not with recurrence-free survival (p = 0.93). Patients initially treated with PDD-TURBT, and with a tumor diameter <30 mm and multifocality had a relatively high benefit from second TUR. The rates of residual tumor and risk stratification of NMIBC did not significantly differ between WL-TURBT and PDD-TURBT groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggested that a second TUR could be omitted after an initial PDD-TURBT in selected patients with high-risk NMIBC.