Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil.
Instituto de Radiologia da Faculdade de Medicina da USP, São Paulo, Brazil.
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2024 Sep;23(9):2829-2835. doi: 10.1111/jocd.16343. Epub 2024 May 1.
Complications of temporary and permanent fillers have been extensively studied. However, there is a lack of comparative data regarding poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA), calcium hydroxyapatite (CaHA), and polycaprolactone (PCL) known as collagen biostimulators.
This study addressed the complications of collagen biostimulators concerning their diagnosis, type of product, treatment, and monitoring.
PATIENTS/METHODS: An electronic questionnaire was sent to Brazilian dermatologic ultrasound experts to identify complications related to biostimulators. The type of biostimulator, location of application, number of vials injected, application plan, time between injection treatment and complication, injector profile, treatment, and prognosis were assessed.
Fifty-five cases were identified, of which 49.1% were caused by PLLA-Elleva®, 23.6% by CaHA (alone or combined with hyaluronic acid), 20.0% by PLLA-Sculptra®, and 7.3% by PCL. The most affected area was the face (72.7%), with nodules being the most common clinical form (89.1%), generally occurring late (60.0%) (>1 month). Only one case was injected at an incorrect depth (musculoaponeurotic system-SMAS). Despite several treatments, including saline (45.5%), hyaluronidase (25.5%), diluted corticosteroids (23.6%), and energy-based devices (10.9%), only five cases showed complete resolution. Hyaluronidase was beneficial in complications related to fillers when there was an association of calcium hydroxyapatite with hyaluronic acid (p < 0.01).
Complications from collagen biostimulators were more common on the face, typically manifesting about 1 month after treatment. These issues seemed to be related more to the properties of the products rather than inadequate technique. Furthermore, hyaluronidase demonstrated efficacy only in cases where there was an association with HA.
已广泛研究了临时和永久性填充物的并发症。然而,对于聚左旋乳酸(PLLA)、钙羟磷灰石(CaHA)和聚己内酯(PCL)等胶原蛋白生物刺激剂,缺乏相关的比较数据。
本研究针对胶原蛋白生物刺激剂的并发症,包括其诊断、产品类型、治疗和监测进行了研究。
患者/方法:向巴西皮肤科超声专家发送了电子问卷,以确定与生物刺激剂相关的并发症。评估了生物刺激剂的类型、应用部位、注射瓶数、应用方案、注射治疗与并发症之间的时间、注射者类型、治疗和预后。
共发现 55 例病例,其中 49.1%是由 PLLA-Elleva®引起的,23.6%是由 CaHA(单独或与透明质酸结合)引起的,20.0%是由 PLLA-Sculptra®引起的,7.3%是由 PCL 引起的。受影响最严重的区域是面部(72.7%),最常见的临床形式是结节(89.1%),通常发生在晚期(60.0%)(>1 个月)。只有 1 例注射深度不正确(肌肉筋膜系统-SMAS)。尽管进行了多种治疗,包括盐水(45.5%)、透明质酸酶(25.5%)、稀释皮质类固醇(23.6%)和能量设备(10.9%),但只有 5 例完全缓解。透明质酸酶在与透明质酸相关的钙羟磷灰石相关并发症中是有益的(p<0.01)。
胶原蛋白生物刺激剂的并发症更常见于面部,通常在治疗后约 1 个月出现。这些问题似乎与产品的特性有关,而不是技术不当。此外,透明质酸酶仅在与 HA 相关的情况下才有效。