Suppr超能文献

预测孤立性半月板桶柄状撕裂的三个形态学危险因素。

Three Morphological Risk Factors for Predicting Isolated Meniscal Bucket-handle Tear.

作者信息

Gültekin Muhammet Zeki, Keskin Zeynep, Arslan Serdar, Dinç Engin, Dinçel Yaşar Mahsut

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Konya City Hospital, Konya, Turkey.

Department of Radiology, Konya City Hospital, Konya, Turkey.

出版信息

Indian J Orthop. 2024 Apr 4;58(5):517-526. doi: 10.1007/s43465-024-01124-4. eCollection 2024 May.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The study aimed to investigate whether morphometric variables of the knee can predict isolated meniscal bucket-handle tears and identify the risk factors.

METHODS

The study included 146 participants with a mean age of 36.547 ± 12.279 years. They included two groups of 73 patients each: one group with isolated meniscal bucket-handle tears and another with no knee injury (control group). Magnetic resonance imaging findings of the participants were retrospectively assessed. A few morphometric variables associated with distal femur, proximal tibia, and cruciate ligaments were measured.

RESULTS

Cruciate ligament tensity (CLT), medial femoral condylar height (MFCH), and lateral meniscal bone angle (LMBA) were found to be 12.7 ± 0.3, 30.1 ± 2.5 mm, and 21.2° ± 3.4°, respectively, in patients with meniscal bucket-handle tear, compared with 11.9 ± 0.2, 28.3 ± 2.7 mm, and 26.5° ± 3.7° in the control group, respectively. Based on multivariate Firth's logistic regression analysis, CLT (Odds ratio [OR]: 456.533; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 27.582 to > 999.999), MFCH (OR: 1.603; 95% CI: 1.023-2.513), and LMBA (OR: 0.780; 95% CI: 0.624-0.975) could distinguish between meniscal bucket-handle tears and knees without meniscus tears ( < 0.05). Based on the multicategorical multinominal regression model, CLT (OR: > 999.999; 95% CI: 49.937 to > 999.999) and MFCH (OR: 1.903; 95% CI: 1.005-3.606) were the determinant variables in differentiating medial meniscal bucket-handle tears from knees without meniscus tears ( < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Large CLT, high medial condyle, and small LMBA were revealed as the morphometric risk factors for meniscal bucket-handle tear.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨膝关节的形态学变量是否能够预测孤立性半月板桶柄状撕裂,并确定其危险因素。

方法

本研究纳入了146名参与者,平均年龄为36.547±12.279岁。他们分为两组,每组73例患者:一组为孤立性半月板桶柄状撕裂患者,另一组为无膝关节损伤患者(对照组)。对参与者的磁共振成像结果进行回顾性评估。测量了一些与股骨远端、胫骨近端和交叉韧带相关的形态学变量。

结果

半月板桶柄状撕裂患者的交叉韧带张力(CLT)、股骨内侧髁高度(MFCH)和外侧半月板骨角(LMBA)分别为12.7±0.3、30.1±2.5mm和21.2°±3.4°,而对照组分别为11.9±0.2、28.3±2.7mm和26.5°±3.7°。基于多变量费思逻辑回归分析,CLT(比值比[OR]:456.533;95%置信区间[CI]:27.582至>999.999)、MFCH(OR:1.603;95%CI:1.023 - 2.513)和LMBA(OR:0.780;95%CI:0.624 - 0.975)能够区分半月板桶柄状撕裂和无半月板撕裂的膝关节(P<0.05)。基于多分类多项回归模型,CLT(OR:>999.999;95%CI:49.937至>999.999)和MFCH(OR:1.903;95%CI:1.005 - 3.606)是区分内侧半月板桶柄状撕裂和无半月板撕裂膝关节的决定性变量(P<0.05)。

结论

大的CLT、高的内侧髁和小的LMBA被揭示为半月板桶柄状撕裂的形态学危险因素。

相似文献

1
Three Morphological Risk Factors for Predicting Isolated Meniscal Bucket-handle Tear.
Indian J Orthop. 2024 Apr 4;58(5):517-526. doi: 10.1007/s43465-024-01124-4. eCollection 2024 May.
4
Meniscal and Chondral Injury Patterns in Athletes With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear.
Cureus. 2023 Nov 23;15(11):e49282. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49282. eCollection 2023 Nov.
6
MRI in the Diagnosis of Bucket Handle Tears: What Is the Current Situation?
Cureus. 2023 Aug 11;15(8):e43324. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43324. eCollection 2023 Aug.
7
Displaced Medial and Lateral Bucket Handle Meniscal Tears With Intact ACL and PCL.
Orthopedics. 2015 Aug;38(8):e738-41. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20150804-91.
8
Comparative Outcomes of Radial and Bucket-Handle Meniscal Tear Repair: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Sep;46(11):2653-2660. doi: 10.1177/0363546518786035. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
10
Bucket handle tears of the medial meniscus: meniscal intrusion rather than meniscal extrusion.
Skeletal Radiol. 2007 Jan;36(1):29-34. doi: 10.1007/s00256-006-0183-4. Epub 2006 Oct 19.

引用本文的文献

1
ACL rupture from medial meniscus tear and high tibial slope: Case report.
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2025 Jun;131:111352. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2025.111352. Epub 2025 Apr 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Morphometric risk factors effects on anterior cruciate ligament injury.
Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2023;34(1):130-137. doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2023.910. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
2
Meniscal Bone Angle Is a Strong Predictor of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury.
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022 Oct 1;4(6):e1993-e2003. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2022.08.008. eCollection 2022 Dec.
3
Association of Meniscus Injuries in Patients With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries.
Cureus. 2022 Jun 12;14(6):e25878. doi: 10.7759/cureus.25878. eCollection 2022 Jun.
4
The Epidemiology of Meniscus Injury.
Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2021 Sep 1;29(3):e24-e33. doi: 10.1097/JSA.0000000000000329.
5
Anatomic characteristics of the knee influence the risk of suffering an isolated meniscal injury and the risk factors differ between women and men.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Nov;29(11):3751-3762. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06396-5. Epub 2021 Jan 3.
6
Lateral Meniscal Oblique Radial Tears Are Common With ACL Injury: A Classification System Based on Arthroscopic Tear Patterns in 600 Consecutive Patients.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 May 19;8(5):2325967120921737. doi: 10.1177/2325967120921737. eCollection 2020 May.
7
Clinical outcome and failure analysis of medial meniscus bucket-handle tear repair: a series of 96 patients with a minimum 2 year follow-up.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020 Nov;140(11):1649-1654. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03346-1. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
8
The Burden of Meniscus Injury in Young and Physically Active Populations.
Clin Sports Med. 2020 Jan;39(1):13-27. doi: 10.1016/j.csm.2019.08.008.
9
Meniscus Form and Function.
Clin Sports Med. 2020 Jan;39(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.csm.2019.08.007.
10
Multivariable analysis of anatomic risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament injury in active individuals.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019 Sep;139(9):1277-1285. doi: 10.1007/s00402-019-03210-x. Epub 2019 Jun 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验