Division Gerontology and Health Research, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Krems, Austria.
Interdisciplinary Center for Gender Studies, Switzerland and Goa Institute for Management, University of Bern, Goa, India.
Gerontologist. 2024 Jun 1;64(6). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnae039.
Algorithmic technologies and (large) data infrastructures, often referred to as Artificial Intelligence (AI), have received increasing attention from gerontological research in the last decade. Although there is much literature that dissects and explores the development, application, and evaluation of AI relevant to gerontology, this study makes a novel contribution by critically engaging with the theorizing in this growing field of research. We observe that gerontology's engagement with AI is shaped by an interventionist logic that situates AI as a black box for gerontological research. We demonstrate how this black box logic has neglected many aspects of AI as a research topic for gerontology and discuss three classical concepts in gerontology to show how they can be used to open various black boxes of aging and AI in the areas: (a) the datafication of aging, (b) the political economy of AI and aging, and (c) everyday engagements and embodiments of AI in later life. In the final chapter, we propose a model of the co-constitution of aging and AI that makes theoretical propositions to study the relational terrain between aging and AI and hence aims to open the black box of AI in gerontology beyond interventionist logic.
在过去的十年中,算法技术和(大型)数据基础设施,通常被称为人工智能(AI),受到老年学研究的越来越多的关注。尽管有很多文献剖析和探讨了与老年学相关的 AI 的发展、应用和评估,但本研究通过批判性地参与这一不断发展的研究领域的理论化,做出了新的贡献。我们观察到,老年学对 AI 的参与受到干预主义逻辑的影响,将 AI 视为老年学研究的黑箱。我们展示了这种黑箱逻辑如何忽视了 AI 作为老年学研究课题的许多方面,并讨论了老年学中的三个经典概念,以展示它们如何用于打开老龄化和 AI 领域的各种黑箱:(a)老龄化的数据化,(b)AI 和老龄化的政治经济学,以及(c)晚年生活中 AI 的日常参与和体现。在最后一章,我们提出了一个老龄化和 AI 的共同构成模型,该模型提出了理论命题,以研究老龄化和 AI 之间的关系地形,从而旨在超越干预主义逻辑打开老年学中的 AI 黑箱。