Department of Neurology, Catholic University of Korea Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Neurology, Yonsei University Severance Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Cerebellum. 2024 Oct;23(5):2003-2011. doi: 10.1007/s12311-024-01698-7. Epub 2024 May 3.
Two vestibular signals, rotational and inertial cues, converge for the perception of complex motion. However, how vestibular perception is built on neuronal behaviors and decision-making processes, especially during the simultaneous presentation of rotational and inertial cues, has yet to be elucidated in humans. In this study, we analyzed the perceptual responses of 20 participants after pairwise rotational experiments, comprised of four control and four test sessions. In both control and test sessions, participants underwent clockwise and counterclockwise rotations in head-down and head-up positions. The difference between the control and test sessions was the head re-orientation relative to gravity after rotations, thereby providing only rotational cues in the control sessions and both rotational and inertial cues in the test sessions. The accuracy of perceptual responses was calculated by comparing the direction of rotational and inertial cues acquired from participants with that predicted by the velocity-storage model. The results showed that the accuracy of rotational perception ranged from 80 to 95% in the four control sessions but significantly decreased to 35 to 75% in the four test sessions. The accuracy of inertial perception in the test sessions ranged from 50 to 70%. The accuracy of rotational perception improved with repetitive exposure to the simultaneous presentation of both rotational and inertial cues, while the accuracy of inertial perception remained steady. The results suggested a significant interaction between rotational and inertial perception and implied that vestibular perception acquired in patients with vestibular disorders are potentially inaccurate.
两个前庭信号,旋转和惯性线索,融合在一起形成对复杂运动的感知。然而,前庭感知是如何建立在神经元行为和决策过程之上的,尤其是在同时呈现旋转和惯性线索的情况下,在人类中还尚未阐明。在这项研究中,我们分析了 20 名参与者在成对旋转实验后的感知反应,实验包括四个对照组和四个实验组。在对照组和实验组中,参与者都经历了头朝下和头朝上位置的顺时针和逆时针旋转。对照组和实验组的区别在于旋转后头部相对于重力的重新定向,因此在对照组中只提供旋转线索,而在实验组中则提供旋转和惯性线索。通过将参与者获得的旋转和惯性线索的方向与速度存储模型预测的方向进行比较,计算出感知反应的准确性。结果表明,在四个对照组中,旋转感知的准确性范围为 80%至 95%,但在四个实验组中显著下降至 35%至 75%。实验组中惯性感知的准确性范围为 50%至 70%。旋转感知的准确性随着对同时呈现的旋转和惯性线索的重复暴露而提高,而惯性感知的准确性保持稳定。结果表明旋转和惯性感知之间存在显著的相互作用,并暗示前庭障碍患者获得的前庭感知可能不准确。