Wade Nicola, Paul Ninu, Nagar Nathan, Rolland Sarah, Germain Sarah
Orthodontic Department, Cumberland Infirmary, Carlisle, UK.
School of Dental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
J Orthod. 2025 Mar;52(1):63-71. doi: 10.1177/14653125241249494. Epub 2024 May 8.
To explore how orthognathic patients seek information during decision-making.
Qualitative, cross-sectional study.
A hospital in Cumbria, UK.
Prospective orthognathic patients.
Participants were purposively recruited from joint orthognathic clinics after the original consultation. Semi-structured interviews were conducted via remote video call with nine participants aged 18-30 years. Data collection and reflexive thematic analysis occurred in parallel until thematic saturation was achieved.
The central finding of this research was that patients were making informed decisions about orthognathic surgery. Four themes were identified to support this central finding including the following: (1) selective engagement with orthognathic information sources; (2) the central role of patient-specific information from professionals and peers; (3) Internet use to supplement standard information resources; and (4) concerns over information found online. The preferred source of information was verbal from the clinical team as it was trusted and person-specific. Past patients were identified as valued sources of information and establishing contact through digital social media networks was found to be a convenient alternative to face-to-face. Online information found was valued but concerns included information overload, problems establishing applicability and concerns over its credibility.
Orthognathic patients were making informed decisions about their treatment. This study highlights the central role of the patient-clinician interaction in decision-making, especially in providing patient-specific information. Insight into the nuances of information-seeking behaviours will better inform clinical care. Since patients frequently access online information that is decision-relevant, encouraging patients to discuss online searches will support the shared decision-making process and alleviate any concerns with information found. During consultation, explaining the purpose of an information aid rather than expecting patients to read them separately, may further enhance its usefulness in decision-making. This study identified an unmet need for visual aids, such as real-time images of postoperative recovery. These findings can inform the design of future information resources.
探讨正颌患者在决策过程中如何获取信息。
定性横断面研究。
英国坎布里亚郡的一家医院。
拟行正颌手术的患者。
在初次会诊后,从联合正颌诊所中有意招募参与者。通过远程视频通话对9名年龄在18至30岁之间的参与者进行半结构化访谈。数据收集和反思性主题分析并行进行,直至达到主题饱和。
本研究的核心发现是患者正在对正颌手术做出明智的决策。确定了四个主题来支持这一核心发现,包括:(1)有选择地接触正颌信息来源;(2)专业人员和同伴提供的针对患者的信息的核心作用;(3)利用互联网补充标准信息资源;(4)对网上信息的担忧。首选的信息来源是临床团队的口头信息,因为它值得信赖且针对个人。过去的患者被认为是有价值的信息来源,通过数字社交媒体网络建立联系被发现是面对面交流的便捷替代方式。所获取的在线信息很有价值,但担忧包括信息过载、难以确定适用性以及对其可信度的担忧。
正颌患者正在对其治疗做出明智的决策。本研究强调了患者与临床医生互动在决策过程中的核心作用,尤其是在提供针对患者的信息方面。深入了解信息寻求行为的细微差别将为临床护理提供更好的指导。由于患者经常获取与决策相关的在线信息,鼓励患者讨论在线搜索内容将有助于支持共同决策过程,并减轻对所获信息的任何担忧。在会诊期间,解释信息辅助工具的用途而不是期望患者分别阅读,可能会进一步提高其在决策中的有用性。本研究确定了对视觉辅助工具(如术后恢复实时图像)的未满足需求。这些发现可为未来信息资源的设计提供参考。