Fortea Laura, Sanz-Serrano Diana, Luz Luciana-Batista, Bardini Giulia, Mercade Montse
Department of Dentistry, Universitat de Barcelona, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.
Department of Dentistry, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
J Clin Exp Dent. 2024 Apr 1;16(4):e516-e538. doi: 10.4317/jced.60989. eCollection 2024 Apr.
The aim of this review was to assess the evidence regarding the most commonly used chelating agents in terms of efficacy, erosive potential, cytotoxicity, interaction, antimicrobial effect, impact on sealers adhesion, and release of growth factors.
MEDLINE (PubMed) database, Cochrane Library and Scopus were searched up to January 14, 2023, including studies with one or more of the following chelating agents: 17% EDTA, 9% and 18% HEDP, 10% and 20% citric acid, 2%-2.25% peracetic acid and 7% maleic acid. In addition, the reference lists of all selected articles were also checked to identify additional relevant studies. Articles published in English and available in full-text were selected. The quality of studies was assessed using the modified CONSORT checklist guide and the Cochrane Collaboration tool.
The electronic search yielded 538 citations, 56 of which were included. The articles included had moderate and low evidence values. Among 56 articles included, 55 were in vitro studies and one was a randomized clinical trial. Among the in vitro studies, 15 evaluated efficacy and dentin erosion, 12 evaluated interaction with other endodontic irrigants, 9 tested antimicrobial effect, 4 evaluated cytotoxicity in hamster and rat lung cells, 9 evaluated intervention in adhesion of filling materials and 8 focused on release of growth factors and on behavior of stem cells in regenerative endodontic. The RCT tested antimicrobial effect.
17% EDTA is the most effective in smear layer removal and in releasing growth factors on regenerative endodontics. However, the current incorporation of 9% and 18% etidronic acid has shown optimal results due to its compatibility with sodium hypochlorite and its capability on avoiding smear layer formation through a continuous chelation action. Despite these preliminary findings, methodological standardization between studies is required and in vivo studies are necessary to confirm in vitro studies. Chelating Agents, Smear Layer, Systematic Review, Endodontics, Root Canal Irrigants.
本综述的目的是评估关于最常用螯合剂在疗效、侵蚀潜力、细胞毒性、相互作用、抗菌作用、对封闭剂黏附的影响以及生长因子释放方面的证据。
检索了截至2023年1月14日的MEDLINE(PubMed)数据库、Cochrane图书馆和Scopus,包括使用以下一种或多种螯合剂的研究:17%乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)、9%和18%羟基亚乙基二膦酸(HEDP)、10%和20%柠檬酸、2%-2.25%过氧乙酸以及7%马来酸。此外,还检查了所有入选文章的参考文献列表,以识别其他相关研究。选择以英文发表且可获取全文的文章。使用修改后的CONSORT清单指南和Cochrane协作工具评估研究质量。
电子检索产生了538条引文,其中56条被纳入。纳入的文章证据价值为中等和低等。在纳入的56篇文章中,55篇为体外研究,1篇为随机临床试验。在体外研究中,15篇评估了疗效和牙本质侵蚀,12篇评估了与其他根管冲洗剂的相互作用,9篇测试了抗菌作用,4篇评估了对仓鼠和大鼠肺细胞的细胞毒性,9篇评估了对充填材料黏附的干预,8篇关注生长因子的释放以及再生性根管治疗中干细胞的行为。随机临床试验测试了抗菌作用。
17%的EDTA在去除玷污层和在再生性根管治疗中释放生长因子方面最有效。然而,目前9%和18%依替膦酸的应用已显示出最佳效果,因其与次氯酸钠具有相容性,且能够通过持续的螯合作用避免玷污层形成。尽管有这些初步发现,但仍需要研究之间的方法学标准化,并且需要进行体内研究以证实体外研究结果。螯合剂、玷污层、系统评价、牙髓病学、根管冲洗剂