Suppr超能文献

三排钉胰腺剥离在腹腔镜胰体尾切除术的疗效:一项回顾性观察研究。

Efficacy of Pancreatic Dissection With a Triple-row Stapler in Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy: A Retrospective Observational Study.

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, Hachioji, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2024 Jun 1;34(3):295-300. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001284.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pancreatic fistulas (POPFs) occur after 20% to 30% of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomies. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy using triple-row staplers in preventing POPFs.

METHODS

Between April 2016 and May 2023, 59 patients underwent complete laparoscopic distal pancreatectomies. There were more females (n=34, 57.6%) than males (n=25, 42.4%). The median age of the patients was 68.9 years. The patients were divided into slow-compression (n=19) and no-compression (n=40) groups and examined for pancreatic leakage. Both groups were examined with respect to age, sex, body mass index (BMI), pancreatic thickness at the pancreatic dissection site, pancreatic texture, diagnosis, operative time, blood loss, presence of POPF, date of drain removal, and length of hospital stay. In addition, risk factors for POPF were examined in a multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Grade B POPFs were found in 9 patients (15.3%). Using univariate analysis, the operative time, blood loss, postoperative pancreatic fluid leakage, day of drain removal, and hospital stay were shorter in the no-compression group than in the slow-compression group. Using multivariate analysis, the absence of POPFs was significantly more frequent in the no-compression group (odds ratio, 5.69; 95% CI, 1.241-26.109; P =0.025). The no-compression pancreatic dissection method was a simple method for reducing POPF incidence.

CONCLUSIONS

The method of quickly dissecting the pancreas without compression yielded better results than the method of slowly dissecting the pancreas with slow compression. This quick dissection without compression was a simple and safe method that minimized postoperative pancreatic fluid leakage, shortened the operative time and length of hospital stay, and reduced medical costs. Therefore, this method might be a clinically successful option.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜胰体尾切除术(laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy,LDP)后约 20%~30%的患者会发生胰瘘(postoperative pancreatic fistulas,POPFs)。本研究旨在评估使用三排吻合器行 LDP 预防 POPFs 的临床疗效。

方法

2016 年 4 月至 2023 年 5 月,59 例行 LDP 的患者纳入本研究。其中女性 34 例(57.6%),男性 25 例(42.4%)。患者中位年龄为 68.9 岁。根据胰管断端是否缝合(slow-compression 组 19 例,no-compression 组 40 例)分为两组,比较两组术后胰瘘发生情况。分析两组患者的年龄、性别、体质量指数(body mass index,BMI)、胰腺离断处胰腺厚度、胰腺质地、诊断、手术时间、出血量、POPFs 发生情况、引流管拔除时间及住院时间等。采用多因素分析探讨影响 POPFs 的危险因素。

结果

9 例(15.3%)患者发生 B 级胰瘘。单因素分析显示,no-compression 组手术时间、出血量、术后胰瘘、引流管拔除时间及住院时间均短于 slow-compression 组。多因素分析显示,no-compression 组无 POPFs 发生率更高(比值比 5.69,95%可信区间 1.241~26.109,P=0.025)。不压迫胰腺的胰体尾游离方法能显著降低 POPFs 发生率。

结论

与缓慢压迫胰腺游离相比,快速不压迫胰腺游离的方法能获得更好的效果。这种快速不压迫游离是一种简单、安全的方法,能最大限度地减少术后胰液漏,缩短手术时间和住院时间,降低医疗费用。因此,该方法可能是一种有临床应用前景的方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验