Department of Oncology, Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation with Division of Pneumology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Department of Oncology, Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation with Division of Pneumology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
ESMO Open. 2024 May;9(5):103449. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103449. Epub 2024 May 13.
In relapsed or refractory (RR) metastatic germ cell cancer (GCC), high-dose (HD) chemotherapy (CTX) plus autologous stem cell transplantation is considered the standard of care. Limited data exist regarding the efficacy of HD-CTX following conventionally dosed salvage regimens (CDRs). This analysis explores and contrasts the efficacy of HD-CTX as the first or subsequent salvage regimen.
Data were retrospectively collected to explore the efficacy of HD-CTX administered as the first (group A) or subsequent salvage CTX (group B) after a CDR. The primary endpoint was OS from the time of HD-CTX. Associations of survival, overall response rate (ORR), and toxicity with clinical characteristics were explored using stratified Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models.
Overall, 283 patients with GCC were included from 11 international centers, with 159 patients (56%) in group A and 124 patients (44%) in group B. The first salvage treatment was administered between 1998 and 2022, with a median follow-up of 27.0 [standard deviation (SD) 46.2] months for group A and 17.0 (SD 48.5) months for group B. The median OS from HD-CTX treatment initiation was not reached in group A, compared with 25 months in group B (P = 0.00027), associated with 2- and 5-year OS rates of 74% and 63% (group A) versus 53% and 37% (group B), respectively. When administered as the first salvage treatment, HD-CTX was associated with a higher ORR (79% versus 60%; P = 0.013) and lower nonhematologic grade ≥3 toxicity rate (78% versus 97%; P < 0.001). Concerning risk factor analysis for the total cohort, the International Prognostic Factors Study Group score was the only independent predictor of OS in multivariable analysis (P = 0.006).
When administered as the initial salvage treatment or after CDR, HD-CTX exhibits curative potential for patients with RR GCC. The efficacy and safety outcomes were more favorable when HD-CTX was conducted as the first salvage treatment line.
在复发或难治性(RR)转移性生殖细胞瘤(GCC)中,大剂量(HD)化疗(CTX)联合自体干细胞移植被认为是标准治疗方法。关于常规剂量挽救方案(CDR)后 HD-CTX 的疗效数据有限。本分析探讨并对比了 HD-CTX 作为一线或二线挽救方案的疗效。
回顾性收集数据,以探讨 CDR 后接受 HD-CTX 作为一线(A 组)或二线挽救 CTX(B 组)的疗效。主要终点为从 HD-CTX 开始的 OS。使用分层 Kaplan-Meier 和 Cox 回归模型探讨生存、总缓解率(ORR)和毒性与临床特征的相关性。
总体而言,从 11 个国际中心纳入了 283 例 GCC 患者,其中 A 组 159 例(56%),B 组 124 例(44%)。一线挽救治疗于 1998 年至 2022 年进行,A 组的中位随访时间为 27.0 个月(标准差 [SD] 46.2),B 组为 17.0 个月(SD 48.5)。A 组从 HD-CTX 治疗开始的中位 OS 未达到,而 B 组为 25 个月(P=0.00027),2 年和 5 年 OS 率分别为 74%和 63%(A 组)和 53%和 37%(B 组)。当作为一线挽救治疗时,HD-CTX 与更高的 ORR(79%比 60%;P=0.013)和更低的非血液学 3 级及以上毒性发生率(78%比 97%;P<0.001)相关。关于总队列的风险因素分析,国际预后因素研究组评分是多变量分析中 OS 的唯一独立预测因素(P=0.006)。
当作为 RR GCC 患者的初始挽救治疗或 CDR 后使用时,HD-CTX 具有治愈潜力。当 HD-CTX 作为一线挽救治疗线时,疗效和安全性结果更为有利。