Department of Psychology and Human Development, Vanderbilt University, Peabody 552, 230 Appleton Place, Nashville, TN, 37203, USA.
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2024 Sep;27(3):1-20. doi: 10.1007/s10567-024-00481-8. Epub 2024 May 15.
Psychological interventions for adolescents have shown mixed efficacy, and including parents in interventions may be an important avenue to improve treatment outcomes. Evidence from meta-analyses examining the role of parents in interventions for youth is inconsistent and has typically combined findings for both children and adolescents together. No prior meta-analysis has examined the specific role of parents in adolescent interventions as compared with interventions focused solely on adolescents across several disorders. To address this gap, systematic literature reviews were conducted utilizing a combination of searches among keywords including (parent * OR family) AND (intervention OR therap * OR treatment OR prevent*) AND (adolescen*). Inclusion criteria were (1) a randomized controlled trial of an individual psychological intervention compared to the same intervention with a parental component, and (2) adolescents must have at least current symptoms or risk to be included. Literature searches identified 20 trials (N = 1251). Summary statistics suggested that interventions involving parents in treatment have a significantly greater impact on adolescent psychopathology when compared to interventions that targeted adolescents alone (g = - 0.18, p < .01, 95% CI [- 0.30, - 0.07]). Examination with symptom type (internalizing or externalizing) as a moderator found that the significant difference remained for externalizing (g = - 0.20, p = .01, 95% CI [- 0.35, - 0.05]) but not internalizing psychopathology (p = .11). Findings provide evidence of the importance of including parents in adolescent therapy, particularly for externalizing problems.
心理干预对青少年的效果参差不齐,而让父母参与干预可能是改善治疗效果的重要途径。元分析中关于父母在青少年干预中的作用的证据并不一致,通常将儿童和青少年的研究结果混合在一起。以前没有meta 分析研究过父母在青少年干预中的具体作用,而只研究了几种障碍中仅针对青少年的干预。为了解决这一差距,我们进行了系统的文献综述,使用了包括“(parent* OR family) AND (intervention OR therap* OR treatment OR prevent*) AND (adolescen*)”在内的关键词搜索。纳入标准为:(1) 比较个体心理干预与包含父母参与的相同干预的随机对照试验;(2) 必须有至少当前症状或风险的青少年才能纳入。文献搜索确定了 20 项试验(N = 1251)。汇总统计数据表明,与仅针对青少年的干预相比,让父母参与治疗的干预对青少年的心理病理学有显著更大的影响(g = -0.18,p < 0.01,95%CI [-0.30,-0.07])。根据症状类型(内化或外化)作为调节因素进行检查发现,外化的显著差异仍然存在(g = -0.20,p = 0.01,95%CI [-0.35,-0.05]),但内化的心理病理学则没有(p = 0.11)。这些发现提供了证据表明,让父母参与青少年治疗非常重要,特别是对于外化问题。