Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine & Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
South Yorkshire Cardiothoracic Centre, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Heart. 2024 Jul 25;110(16):1048-1055. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2024-324039.
The practical application of 'virtual' (computed) fractional flow reserve (vFFR) based on invasive coronary angiogram (ICA) images is unknown. The objective of this cohort study was to investigate the potential of vFFR to guide the management of unselected patients undergoing ICA. The hypothesis was that it changes management in >10% of cases.
vFFR was computed using the Sheffield VIRTUheart system, at five hospitals in the North of England, on 'all-comers' undergoing ICA for non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and chronic coronary syndrome (CCS). The cardiologists' management plan (optimal medical therapy, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass surgery or 'more information required') and confidence level were recorded after ICA, and again after vFFR disclosure.
517 patients were screened; 320 were recruited: 208 with ACS and 112 with CCS. The median vFFR was 0.82 (0.70-0.91). vFFR disclosure did not change the mean number of significantly stenosed vessels per patient (1.16 (±0.96) visually and 1.18 (±0.92) with vFFR (p=0.79)). A change in intended management following vFFR disclosure occurred in 22% of all patients; in the ACS cohort, there was a 62% increase in the number planned for medical management, and in the CCS cohort, there was a 31% increase in the number planned for PCI. In all patients, vFFR disclosure increased physician confidence from 8 of 10 (7.33-9) to 9 of 10 (8-10) (p<0.001).
The addition of vFFR to ICA changed intended management strategy in 22% of patients, provided a detailed and specific 'all-in-one' anatomical and physiological assessment of coronary artery disease, and was accompanied by augmentation of the operator's confidence in the treatment strategy.
基于有创冠状动脉造影(ICA)图像的“虚拟”(计算)血流储备分数(vFFR)的实际应用尚不清楚。本队列研究的目的是调查 vFFR 指导非选择性行 ICA 的患者管理的潜力。假设它会改变 10%以上病例的管理策略。
在英格兰北部的五家医院,使用谢菲尔德 VIRTUheart 系统,对因非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)和慢性冠状动脉综合征(CCS)而行 ICA 的“所有患者”进行 vFFR 计算。在 ICA 后和 vFFR 结果公布后,记录心脏病专家的管理计划(最佳药物治疗、经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)、冠状动脉旁路手术或“需要更多信息”)和信心水平。
共筛选了 517 例患者,其中 320 例符合入组标准:208 例 ACS 和 112 例 CCS。中位数 vFFR 为 0.82(0.70-0.91)。vFFR 结果公布并未改变每位患者的狭窄血管数量(视觉评估为 1.16(±0.96),FFR 为 1.18(±0.92)(p=0.79))。vFFR 结果公布后,22%的患者的治疗计划发生了变化;ACS 组中,计划接受药物治疗的患者比例增加了 62%,CCS 组中,计划接受 PCI 的患者比例增加了 31%。在所有患者中,vFFR 结果公布增加了医生的信心,从 10 分中的 8 分(7.33-9)增加到 10 分中的 9 分(8-10)(p<0.001)。
将 vFFR 添加到 ICA 中,改变了 22%的患者的治疗策略,提供了详细而具体的冠状动脉疾病的解剖和生理学评估,并增强了操作者对治疗策略的信心。