• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大缺血性脑卒中晚期血管内治疗与药物治疗的安全性和临床结局。

Safety and clinical outcomes of endovascular therapy versus medical management in late presentation of large ischemic stroke.

机构信息

Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Neurology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Eur Stroke J. 2024 Dec;9(4):907-917. doi: 10.1177/23969873241249406. Epub 2024 May 17.

DOI:10.1177/23969873241249406
PMID:38757713
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11569454/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The benefit of endovascular therapy (EVT) among stroke patients with large ischemic core (ASPECTS 0-5) in the extended time window outside of trial settings remains unclear. We analyzed the effect of EVT among these stroke patients in real-world settings.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The CT for Late Endovascular Reperfusion (CLEAR) study recruited patients from 66 centers in 10 countries between 01/2014 and 05/2022. The extended time-window was defined as 6-24 h from last-seen-well to treatment. The primary outcome was shift of the 3-month modified Rankin scale (mRS) score. Safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and mortality. Outcomes were analyzed with ordinal and logistic regressions.

RESULTS

Among 5098 screened patients, 2451 were included in the analysis (median age 73, 55% women). Of patients with ASPECTS 0-5 ( = 310), receiving EVT ( = 209/310) was associated with lower 3-month mRS when compared to medical management (median 4 IQR 3-6 vs 6 IQR 4-6; aOR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.7). Patients undergoing EVT had higher sICH (11.2% vs 4.0%; aOR 4.1, 95% CI 1.2-18.8) and lower mortality (31.6% vs 58.4%, aOR 0.4; 95% CI 0.2-0.9) compared to medically managed patients. The relative benefit of EVT was comparable between patients with ASPECTS 0 and 5 and 6-10 in the extended time window (interaction aOR 0.9; 95% CI 0.5-1.7).

CONCLUSION

In the extended time window, patients with ASPECTS 0-5 may have preserved relative treatment benefit of EVT compared to patients with ASPECTS 6-10. These findings are in line with recent trials showing benefit of EVT among real-world patients with large ischemic core in the extended time window.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04096248.

摘要

介绍

在临床试验设定的时间窗之外,对于大核心梗死区(ASPECTS 0-5)的卒中患者,血管内治疗(EVT)的获益仍不明确。本研究分析了在真实环境下这些卒中患者接受 EVT 的效果。

患者和方法

CT 用于晚期血管再灌注(CLEAR)研究于 2014 年 1 月至 2022 年 5 月在 10 个国家的 66 个中心招募患者。时间窗延长定义为从最后可评估时间至治疗的 6-24 小时。主要结局是 3 个月时改良 Rankin 量表(mRS)评分的变化。安全性结局包括症状性颅内出血(sICH)和死亡率。采用有序和逻辑回归分析结局。

结果

在 5098 例筛选患者中,2451 例纳入分析(中位年龄 73 岁,55%为女性)。ASPECTS 0-5 的患者中(n=310),与药物治疗相比,接受 EVT(n=209/310)的患者 3 个月时 mRS 评分较低(中位数 4 个 IQR 3-6 比 6 个 IQR 4-6;优势比 0.4,95%置信区间 0.2-0.7)。行 EVT 的患者 sICH 发生率较高(11.2%比 4.0%;优势比 4.1,95%置信区间 1.2-18.8),死亡率较低(31.6%比 58.4%,优势比 0.4;95%置信区间 0.2-0.9)。与药物治疗组相比,在延长的时间窗内,ASPECTS 0 与 5 及 6-10 患者接受 EVT 的相对获益相当(交互优势比 0.9;95%置信区间 0.5-1.7)。

结论

在延长的时间窗内,ASPECTS 0-5 的患者与 ASPECTS 6-10 的患者相比,可能仍保留有 EVT 的相对治疗获益。这些发现与最近的临床试验一致,即表明在延长的时间窗内,大核心梗死区的真实世界患者中 EVT 有获益。

临床试验注册号

clinicaltrials.gov;注册号:NCT04096248。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3aca/11585058/1b0c63899fb8/10.1177_23969873241249406-img2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3aca/11585058/1b0c63899fb8/10.1177_23969873241249406-img2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3aca/11585058/1b0c63899fb8/10.1177_23969873241249406-img2.jpg

相似文献

1
Safety and clinical outcomes of endovascular therapy versus medical management in late presentation of large ischemic stroke.大缺血性脑卒中晚期血管内治疗与药物治疗的安全性和临床结局。
Eur Stroke J. 2024 Dec;9(4):907-917. doi: 10.1177/23969873241249406. Epub 2024 May 17.
2
Outcomes of Bridging Intravenous Thrombolysis Versus Endovascular Therapy Alone in Late-Window Acute Ischemic Stroke.静脉溶栓桥接治疗与单纯血管内治疗对急性缺血性脑卒中晚期患者的疗效比较。
Stroke. 2024 Jul;55(7):1767-1775. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.046495. Epub 2024 May 15.
3
Endovascular Therapy for Patients With Low NIHSS Scores and Large Vessel Occlusion in the 6- to 24-Hour Window: Analysis of the CLEAR Study.6至24小时时间窗内低美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分且存在大血管闭塞患者的血管内治疗:CLEAR研究分析
Neurology. 2025 Apr;104(7):e213442. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000213442. Epub 2025 Mar 20.
4
Association Between Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score and Efficacy and Safety Outcomes With Endovascular Therapy in Patients With Stroke From Large-Vessel Occlusion: A Secondary Analysis of the Recovery by Endovascular Salvage for Cerebral Ultra-acute Embolism-Japan Large Ischemic Core Trial (RESCUE-Japan LIMIT). Alberta 卒中项目早期计算机断层扫描评分与血管内治疗对大血管闭塞性卒中患者疗效和安全性结局的关系:血管内拯救治疗用于大脑超急性栓塞-日本大缺血核心试验(RESCUE-Japan LIMIT)的二次分析。
JAMA Neurol. 2022 Dec 1;79(12):1260-1266. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.3285.
5
Clinical and Neuroimaging Outcomes of Direct Thrombectomy vs Bridging Therapy in Large Vessel Occlusion: Analysis of the SELECT Cohort Study.直接取栓与桥接治疗在大血管闭塞中的临床和神经影像学结局:SELECT 队列研究分析。
Neurology. 2021 Jun 8;96(23):e2839-e2853. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012063. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
6
Noncontrast CT Selected Thrombectomy vs Medical Management for Late-Window Anterior Large Vessel Occlusion.非对比 CT 选择性取栓与药物治疗对晚期前大血管闭塞的影响。
Neurology. 2024 May 28;102(10):e209324. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209324. Epub 2024 May 6.
7
Association of Endovascular Thrombectomy vs Medical Management With Functional and Safety Outcomes in Patients Treated Beyond 24 Hours of Last Known Well: The SELECT Late Study.血管内血栓切除术与药物治疗对超过最后已知健康时间 24 小时后治疗的患者的功能和安全性结局的影响:SELECT 晚期研究。
JAMA Neurol. 2023 Feb 1;80(2):172-182. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.4714.
8
Endovascular Thrombectomy for Extracranial Internal Carotid Artery Occlusions With Large Ischemic Strokes: Insights From the SELECT2 Trial.大型缺血性卒中的颅外颈内动脉闭塞血管内血栓切除术:SELECT2试验的见解
Neurology. 2025 Feb 25;104(4):e210269. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000210269. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
9
Safety and Efficacy of Thrombectomy in Vietnamese Stroke Patients Selected through Perfusion Imaging with an Onset Time between 6 and 24 Hours.通过灌注成像筛选的发病时间在6至24小时之间的越南中风患者行血栓切除术的安全性和有效性
Cerebrovasc Dis Extra. 2025;15(1):9-18. doi: 10.1159/000542653. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
10
Comparison of functional and safety outcomes between the extended versus early time window after intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular thrombectomy.静脉溶栓后和血管内取栓术的扩展时间窗与早期时间窗的功能和安全性结局比较。
J Neurol Sci. 2024 Jul 15;462:123107. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2024.123107. Epub 2024 Jun 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Intra-Arterial Urokinase After Endovascular Reperfusion for Acute Ischemic Stroke: The POST-UK Randomized Clinical Trial.急性缺血性卒中血管内再灌注后动脉内注射尿激酶:POST-UK随机临床试验
JAMA. 2025 Feb 18;333(7):589-598. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.23480.
2
CLEAR Thrombectomy Score: An Index to Estimate the Probability of Good Functional Outcome With or Without Endovascular Treatment in the Late Window for Anterior Circulation Occlusion.急性前循环闭塞血管内治疗时间窗延长患者采用或不采用血管内治疗获得良好功能结局的概率评估:清除血栓评分
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Jul 16;13(14):e034948. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.034948. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Mechanical Thrombectomy in the Late Presentation of Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke: A Guideline From the Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology Guidelines and Practice Standards Committee.前循环大血管闭塞性卒中延迟就诊时的机械取栓术:血管与介入神经病学学会指南与实践标准委员会的指南
Stroke Vasc Interv Neurol. 2023 Jan;3(1). doi: 10.1161/SVIN.122.000512. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
2
Endovascular Thrombectomy for Large Ischemic Stroke Across Ischemic Injury and Penumbra Profiles.血管内血栓切除术治疗大面积缺血性脑卒中的缺血损伤和半影谱。
JAMA. 2024 Mar 5;331(9):750-763. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.0572.
3
Endovascular Therapy in the Extended Time Window for Large Vessel Occlusion in Patients With Pre-Stroke Disability.
中风前有残疾的大血管闭塞患者在延长时间窗内的血管内治疗
J Stroke. 2024 May;26(2):269-279. doi: 10.5853/jos.2023.04259. Epub 2024 May 30.
Trial of Endovascular Thrombectomy for Large Ischemic Strokes.
大型缺血性卒中血管内血栓切除术试验
N Engl J Med. 2024 Jan 25;390(4):388. doi: 10.1056/NEJMx230009.
4
Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score, Infarct Core Volume, and Endovascular Therapy Outcomes in Patients With Large Infarct: A Secondary Analysis of the ANGEL-ASPECT Trial.阿尔伯塔省卒中项目早期计算机断层扫描评分、梗死核心体积与大梗死患者血管内治疗结局:ANGEL-ASPECT 试验的二次分析。
JAMA Neurol. 2024 Jan 1;81(1):30-38. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.4430.
5
Endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischaemic stroke with established large infarct: multicentre, open-label, randomised trial.急性缺血性脑卒中伴大梗死的血管内血栓切除术: 多中心、开放标签、随机试验。
Lancet. 2023 Nov 11;402(10414):1753-1763. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02032-9. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
6
Endovascular Thrombectomy for Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke: An Evolution of Trials.血管内血栓切除术治疗前循环大血管闭塞性卒中:试验的演变。
Semin Neurol. 2023 Jun;43(3):397-407. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1771454. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
7
Evaluation of acute mechanical revascularization in large stroke (ASPECTS ⩽5) and large vessel occlusion within 7 h of last-seen-well: The LASTE multicenter, randomized, clinical trial protocol.评估 7 小时内最后可观察到良好时间的大卒中(ASPECTS ⩽5)和大血管闭塞的急性机械再通:LASTE 多中心、随机、临床试验方案。
Int J Stroke. 2024 Jan;19(1):114-119. doi: 10.1177/17474930231191033. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
8
Cost-effectiveness of endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke with large infarct in China.中国急性大面积脑梗死血管内治疗的成本效果分析。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2024 Apr 23;16(5):453-458. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2023-020466.
9
Mechanical Thrombectomy for Large Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.机械取栓治疗大面积缺血性脑卒中:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurology. 2023 Aug 29;101(9):e922-e932. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207536. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
10
One Treatment to Heal them all: Thrombectomy also Benefits Stroke with Large Ischemic Core.一种疗法治愈所有病症:血栓切除术对伴有大面积缺血核心的中风也有益处。
Clin Neuroradiol. 2023 Jun;33(2):267-269. doi: 10.1007/s00062-023-01304-z. Epub 2023 May 26.