Suppr超能文献

神经病理学验证和前驱多巴胺能成像在帕金森病诊断中的诊断准确性。

Neuropathologic Validation and Diagnostic Accuracy of Presynaptic Dopaminergic Imaging in the Diagnosis of Parkinsonism.

机构信息

From the Queen Square Brain Bank for Neurological Disorders (A.H., P.C., S.W., T.R., Z.J., T.T.W., E.D.P.-F.) and Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences (H.R.M.), University College London Queen Square Institute of Neurology; and Institute of Nuclear Medicine (J.C.D.), University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, UK.

出版信息

Neurology. 2024 Jun 11;102(11):e209453. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209453. Epub 2024 May 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Degeneration of the presynaptic nigrostriatal dopaminergic system is one of the main biological features of Parkinson disease (PD), multiple system atrophy (MSA), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), and corticobasal degeneration (CBD), which can be measured using single-photon emission CT imaging for diagnostic purposes. Despite its widespread use in clinical practice and research, the diagnostic properties of presynaptic nigrostriatal dopaminergic (DAT) imaging in parkinsonism have never been evaluated against the diagnostic gold standard of neuropathology. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic parameters of DAT imaging compared with pathologic diagnosis in patients with parkinsonism.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of patients with DAT imaging for the investigation of a clinically uncertain parkinsonism with brain donation between 2010 and 2021 to the Queen Square Brain Bank (London). Patients with DAT imaging for investigation of pure ataxia or dementia syndromes without parkinsonism were excluded. Those with a pathologic diagnosis of PD, MSA, PSP, or CBD were considered presynaptic dopaminergic parkinsonism, and other pathologies were considered postsynaptic for the analysis. DAT imaging was performed in routine clinical practice and visually classified by hospital nuclear medicine specialists as normal or abnormal. The results were correlated with neuropathologic diagnosis to calculate diagnostic accuracy parameters for the diagnosis of presynaptic dopaminergic parkinsonism.

RESULTS

All of 47 patients with PD, 41 of 42 with MSA, 68 of 73 with PSP, and 6 of 10 with CBD (sensitivity 100%, 97.6%, 93.2%, and 60%, respectively) had abnormal presynaptic dopaminergic imaging. Eight of 17 patients with presumed postsynaptic parkinsonism had abnormal scans (specificity 52.9%).

DISCUSSION

DAT imaging has very high sensitivity and negative predictive value for the diagnosis of presynaptic dopaminergic parkinsonism, particularly for PD. However, patients with CBD, and to a lesser extent PSP (of various phenotypes) and MSA (with predominant ataxia), can show normal DAT imaging. A range of other neurodegenerative disorders may have abnormal DAT scans with low specificity in the differential diagnosis of parkinsonism. DAT imaging is a useful diagnostic tool in the differential diagnosis of parkinsonism, although clinicians should be aware of its diagnostic properties and limitations.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class II evidence that DAT imaging does not accurately distinguish between presynaptic dopaminergic parkinsonism and non-presynaptic dopaminergic parkinsonism.

摘要

背景与目的

纹状体多巴胺能系统的突触前退化是帕金森病(PD)、多系统萎缩(MSA)、进行性核上性麻痹(PSP)和皮质基底节变性(CBD)等疾病的主要生物学特征之一,可通过单光子发射 CT 成像进行测量,用于诊断目的。尽管这种方法在临床实践和研究中得到了广泛应用,但在帕金森病中,突触前黑质纹状体多巴胺能(DAT)成像的诊断特性从未与神经病理学的诊断金标准进行过评估。本研究旨在评估 DAT 成像与帕金森病患者的病理诊断相比的诊断参数。

方法

对 2010 年至 2021 年在伦敦 Queen Square Brain Bank 进行 DAT 成像以调查临床不确定的帕金森病的患者进行回顾性队列研究。排除了因单纯性共济失调或痴呆综合征而进行 DAT 成像以排除帕金森病的患者。那些具有 PD、MSA、PSP 或 CBD 病理诊断的患者被认为是突触前多巴胺能帕金森病,其他病理被认为是突触后,用于分析。DAT 成像在常规临床实践中进行,并由医院核医学专家进行视觉分类,分为正常或异常。将结果与神经病理学诊断相关联,以计算诊断突触前多巴胺能帕金森病的诊断准确性参数。

结果

所有 47 例 PD 患者、41 例 MSA 患者、68 例 PSP 患者和 10 例 CBD 患者(敏感性分别为 100%、97.6%、93.2%和 60%)的突触前多巴胺能成像均异常。17 例假定的突触后帕金森病患者中有 8 例扫描异常(特异性为 52.9%)。

讨论

DAT 成像对突触前多巴胺能帕金森病的诊断具有非常高的敏感性和阴性预测值,尤其是对 PD。然而,CBD、程度较轻的 PSP(各种表型)和 MSA(以共济失调为主)患者可能会出现正常的 DAT 成像。其他一系列神经退行性疾病可能会出现 DAT 扫描异常,但特异性较低,难以鉴别帕金森病。DAT 成像在帕金森病的鉴别诊断中是一种有用的诊断工具,尽管临床医生应该了解其诊断特性和局限性。

证据分类

本研究提供了 II 级证据,表明 DAT 成像不能准确区分突触前多巴胺能帕金森病和非突触前多巴胺能帕金森病。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验