Moran Jay, Jimenez Andrew E
Yale University (J.M.).
Arthroscopy. 2025 Mar;41(3):657-659. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.05.004. Epub 2024 May 16.
Compared with postless arthroscopy, hip arthroscopy using a perineal post (post-assisted traction) is associated with increased risk of complications in 1% to 30% of patients, including pudendal neuropraxia (sexual dysfunction, dyspareunia, perineal pain, and/or numbness) and perineal soft-tissue injuries (vulvar bruising, tears, or scrotal swelling). Although these groin-related complications are usually transient in nature, they are significant and should be prevented if at all possible. Because of the sensitive nature of groin-related injuries after surgery, these complications also can go unrecognized by surgeons, which may result in underappreciation of their true prevalence. In contrast, postless distraction can be performed safely and eliminate the risk of perineal-related complications associated with a perineal post. In addition, dynamic evaluation during cam resection is aided by postless techniques and allows for greater and unimpeded hip range of motion compared with motion restriction with the use of a post. Postless hip arthroscopy is an emerging standard for hip arthroscopy surgery, but there are select instances in cases of challenging access to the hip joint for which a post may still have utility. Indications for use of a post could be patients with high body mass index, men with decreased hamstring flexibility, and patients with lower Beighton scores and greater hip stiffness, because if access to the joint is challenging, a perineal post may allow for greater distraction. Of importance, if a perineal post is used, care should be taken toward limiting traction time, as prolonged traction has been shown to be a major risk factor associated with post-related groin complications. In addition, the Trendelenburg position decreases the contact force against the perineal post. Finally, converting from a post-assisted technique to a postless system has a short learning curve for surgeons.
与无会阴柱关节镜检查相比,使用会阴柱(柱辅助牵引)的髋关节镜检查在1%至30%的患者中并发症风险增加,包括阴部神经失用症(性功能障碍、性交困难、会阴疼痛和/或麻木)与会阴软组织损伤(外阴瘀伤、撕裂或阴囊肿胀)。尽管这些与腹股沟相关的并发症通常具有一过性,但它们很严重,应尽可能预防。由于术后与腹股沟相关损伤的敏感性,这些并发症也可能未被外科医生识别,这可能导致对其真实发生率的低估。相比之下,无柱牵引可以安全进行,并消除与会阴柱相关的会阴并发症风险。此外,与使用柱时的活动受限相比,无柱技术有助于在凸轮切除术中进行动态评估,并允许髋关节有更大且不受阻碍的活动范围。无柱髋关节镜检查是髋关节镜手术的一种新兴标准,但在髋关节进入困难的特定情况下,柱可能仍有用处。使用柱的指征可能是身体质量指数高的患者、绳肌柔韧性降低的男性以及Beighton评分较低且髋关节僵硬程度较高的患者,因为如果进入关节有困难,会阴柱可能允许更大的牵引。重要的是,如果使用会阴柱,应注意限制牵引时间,因为长时间牵引已被证明是与会阴柱相关腹股沟并发症的主要危险因素。此外,头低脚高位可降低与会阴柱的接触力。最后,对外科医生来说,从柱辅助技术转换为无柱系统的学习曲线较短。