• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

强化失语症治疗的成功率:2003 年至 2020 年间 448 例患者的真实世界数据。

Success rates of intensive aphasia therapy: real-world data from 448 patients between 2003 and 2020.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.

Institute of Cognitive Neurology and Dementia Research, Otto-Von-Guericke-University, Magdeburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Neurol. 2024 Nov;271(11):7169-7183. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12429-7. Epub 2024 May 20.

DOI:10.1007/s00415-024-12429-7
PMID:38769257
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11561048/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Aphasia is a devastating consequence after stroke, affecting millions of patients each year. Studies have shown that intensive speech and language therapy (SLT) is effective in the chronic phase of aphasia. Leveraging a large single-center cohort of persons with aphasia (PWA) including patients also in the subacute phase, we assessed treatment effects of intensive aphasia therapy in a real-world setting.

METHODS

Data were collected at the Aachen aphasia ward in Germany between 2003 and 2020. Immediate treatment responses across different language domains were assessed with the Aachen Aphasia Test (AAT) using single-case psychometrics, conducted before and after 6-7 weeks of intensive SLT (10 h per week, median (IQR) dosage = 68 (61-76)). We adjusted for spontaneous recovery in subacute patients. Differential treatment effects between subgroups of chronicity and predictors of therapy response were investigated.

RESULTS

A total of 448 PWA were included (29% female, median (IQR) age = 54 (46-62) years, median (IQR) time post-onset = 11 (6-20) months) with 12% in the early subacute, 15% in the late subacute and 74% in the chronic phase of aphasia. The immediate responder rate was 59%. Significant improvements in all AAT subtests und subscales were observed hinting at broad effectiveness across language domains. The degree of therapy-induced improvement did not differ between the chronicity groups. Time post-onset, dosage of therapy and aphasia severity at the beginning of treatment were predictors of immediate treatment response.

DISCUSSION

Intensive therapy protocols for aphasia after stroke are yielding substantial responder rates in a routine clinical setting including a wide range of patients.

摘要

背景

失语症是中风后的一种毁灭性后果,每年影响数以百万计的患者。研究表明,强化言语和语言治疗(SLT)对失语症的慢性期有效。利用包括亚急性期患者在内的大型单中心失语症患者队列,我们在真实环境中评估了强化失语症治疗的治疗效果。

方法

数据收集于德国亚琛失语症病房,时间为 2003 年至 2020 年。使用单病例心理测量学,通过 Aachen Aphasia Test(AAT)评估不同语言领域的即时治疗反应,在 6-7 周的强化 SLT(每周 10 小时,中位数(IQR)剂量=68(61-76))前后进行。我们对亚急性期患者的自发恢复进行了调整。研究了慢性和治疗反应预测因素之间的亚组差异治疗效果。

结果

共纳入 448 例失语症患者(29%为女性,中位(IQR)年龄=54(46-62)岁,中位(IQR)发病后时间=11(6-20)个月),其中 12%为早期亚急性期,15%为晚期亚急性期,74%为慢性失语症期。即时反应率为 59%。所有 AAT 子测试和子量表均观察到显著改善,暗示了跨语言领域的广泛有效性。治疗引起的改善程度在慢性组之间没有差异。发病后时间、治疗剂量和治疗开始时的失语症严重程度是即时治疗反应的预测因素。

讨论

在常规临床环境中,包括广泛的患者群体,强化言语和语言治疗方案对中风后失语症的治疗效果显著。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f4e/11561048/8c5edf02c12c/415_2024_12429_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f4e/11561048/7e1f0f4108d9/415_2024_12429_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f4e/11561048/bd43038f7192/415_2024_12429_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f4e/11561048/8c5edf02c12c/415_2024_12429_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f4e/11561048/7e1f0f4108d9/415_2024_12429_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f4e/11561048/bd43038f7192/415_2024_12429_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f4e/11561048/8c5edf02c12c/415_2024_12429_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Success rates of intensive aphasia therapy: real-world data from 448 patients between 2003 and 2020.强化失语症治疗的成功率:2003 年至 2020 年间 448 例患者的真实世界数据。
J Neurol. 2024 Nov;271(11):7169-7183. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12429-7. Epub 2024 May 20.
2
FCET2EC (From controlled experimental trial to = 2 everyday communication): How effective is intensive integrative therapy for stroke-induced chronic aphasia under routine clinical conditions? A study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.FCET2EC(从对照实验性试验到日常交流):在常规临床条件下,强化综合疗法对中风所致慢性失语症的效果如何?一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2013 Sep 23;14:308. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-308.
3
Precision rehabilitation for aphasia by patient age, sex, aphasia severity, and time since stroke? A prespecified, systematic review-based, individual participant data, network, subgroup meta-analysis.按患者年龄、性别、失语症严重程度和卒中后时间对失语症进行精准康复?一项基于预设、系统评价的个体参与者数据、网络、亚组荟萃分析。
Int J Stroke. 2022 Dec;17(10):1067-1077. doi: 10.1177/17474930221097477. Epub 2022 May 18.
4
Intensive speech and language therapy in patients with chronic aphasia after stroke: a randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint, controlled trial in a health-care setting.在脑卒中后慢性失语症患者中进行强化语言治疗:一项在医疗保健环境中进行的随机、开放标签、盲终点、对照试验。
Lancet. 2017 Apr 15;389(10078):1528-1538. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30067-3. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
5
Self-managed, computerised speech and language therapy for patients with chronic aphasia post-stroke compared with usual care or attention control (Big CACTUS): a multicentre, single-blinded, randomised controlled trial.自我管理、计算机化的言语和语言治疗用于慢性卒中后失语症患者与常规护理或对照(Big CACTUS):一项多中心、单盲、随机对照试验。
Lancet Neurol. 2019 Sep;18(9):821-833. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30192-9.
6
Experiences and perspectives of UK speech and language therapists on telehealth assessment with people living with post-stroke aphasia.英国言语和语言治疗师对中风后失语症患者进行远程健康评估的经验与观点。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Mar-Apr;60(2):e70018. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.70018.
7
Effectiveness of speech language therapy either alone or with add-on computer-based language therapy software (Malayalam version) for early post stroke aphasia: A feasibility study.单独使用言语语言治疗或联合使用基于计算机的语言治疗软件(马拉雅拉姆语版)治疗早期脑卒中后失语症的效果:一项可行性研究。
J Neurol Sci. 2017 Sep 15;380:137-141. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2017.07.010. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
8
Dosage, Intensity, and Frequency of Language Therapy for Aphasia: A Systematic Review-Based, Individual Participant Data Network Meta-Analysis.失语症语言治疗的剂量、强度和频率:基于系统评价的个体参与者数据网络荟萃分析。
Stroke. 2022 Mar;53(3):956-967. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.035216. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
9
A study on the reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Scenario Test for people with chronic stroke-induced aphasia: A cross-sectional study.一项关于慢性脑卒中性失语症患者情景测试日语版的信度和效度的研究:一项横断面研究。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Sep-Oct;59(5):1878-1892. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.13040. Epub 2024 May 1.
10
Computerised speech and language therapy or attention control added to usual care for people with long-term post-stroke aphasia: the Big CACTUS three-arm RCT.计算机化言语和语言治疗或注意力控制联合常规护理用于长期卒中后失语症患者:大 CACTUS 三臂 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Apr;24(19):1-176. doi: 10.3310/hta24190.

引用本文的文献

1
European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guideline on aphasia rehabilitation.欧洲卒中组织(ESO)失语症康复指南。
Eur Stroke J. 2025 May 22:23969873241311025. doi: 10.1177/23969873241311025.
2
Effects of low-frequency rTMS combined with speech and language therapy on Broca's aphasia in subacute stroke patients.低频重复经颅磁刺激联合言语语言治疗对亚急性脑卒中患者布罗卡失语症的影响
Front Neurol. 2024 Oct 30;15:1473254. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1473254. eCollection 2024.
3
Early Boost of Linguistic Skills? Individualized Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation in Early Postacute Aphasia.

本文引用的文献

1
More than one way to improve a CAT: Outcomes and reflections on two iterations of the Queen Square Intensive Comprehensive Aphasia Programme.改善失语症治疗的不止一种方法:关于女王广场强化综合失语症治疗方案两次迭代的结果与思考
Aphasiology. 2023 Dec 6:1-24. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2023.2286703.
2
A systematic review of Intensive Comprehensive Aphasia Programmes - who takes part, what is measured, what are the outcomes?强化全面失语症治疗方案的系统评价——谁参与、测量什么、结果如何?
Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Sep;46(19):4335-4349. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2274877. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
3
Intensive and comprehensive aphasia therapy-a survey of the definitions, practices and views of speech and language therapists in the United Kingdom.
早期语言技能提升?急性失语症后期的个体化非侵入性脑刺激
Brain Sci. 2024 Aug 3;14(8):789. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14080789.
强化和综合失语症疗法——对英国言语语言治疗师的定义、实践和观点的调查。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2023 Nov-Dec;58(6):2077-2102. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12918. Epub 2023 Jul 2.
4
Predicting Outcomes of Language Rehabilitation: Prognostic Factors for Immediate and Long-Term Outcomes After Aphasia Therapy.预测语言康复的结果:失语症治疗后即时和长期结果的预后因素。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023 Mar 7;66(3):1068-1084. doi: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00347. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
5
Predictors of Therapy Response in Chronic Aphasia: Building a Foundation for Personalized Aphasia Therapy.慢性失语症治疗反应的预测因素:为个性化失语症治疗奠定基础。
J Stroke. 2022 May;24(2):189-206. doi: 10.5853/jos.2022.01102. Epub 2022 May 31.
6
Results of the COMPARE trial of Constraint-induced or Multimodality Aphasia Therapy compared with usual care in chronic post-stroke aphasia.中风后慢性失语症患者的约束诱导或多模式失语症疗法与常规护理对比的COMPARE试验结果。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2022 Jun;93(6):573-581. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2021-328422. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
7
Dosage, Intensity, and Frequency of Language Therapy for Aphasia: A Systematic Review-Based, Individual Participant Data Network Meta-Analysis.失语症语言治疗的剂量、强度和频率:基于系统评价的个体参与者数据网络荟萃分析。
Stroke. 2022 Mar;53(3):956-967. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.035216. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
8
A systematic review of maintenance following intensive therapy programs in chronic post-stroke aphasia: importance of individual response analysis.慢性卒中后失语症强化治疗后维持治疗的系统评价:个体反应分析的重要性。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Oct;44(20):5811-5826. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1955303. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
9
Telerehabilitation for people with aphasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.失语症患者的远程康复:系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Commun Disord. 2021 Jul-Aug;92:106111. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2021.106111. Epub 2021 May 13.
10
A Virtual, Randomized, Control Trial of a Digital Therapeutic for Speech, Language, and Cognitive Intervention in Post-stroke Persons With Aphasia.一项针对中风后失语症患者进行言语、语言和认知干预的数字疗法的虚拟随机对照试验。
Front Neurol. 2021 Feb 12;12:626780. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.626780. eCollection 2021.