• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估海洋保护区对冲浪区鱼类的影响。

Evaluating the influence of marine protected areas on surf zone fish.

机构信息

Marine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, USA.

Moss Landing Marine Laboratories, San Jose State University, Moss Landing, California, USA.

出版信息

Conserv Biol. 2024 Dec;38(6):e14296. doi: 10.1111/cobi.14296. Epub 2024 May 21.

DOI:10.1111/cobi.14296
PMID:38770838
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11588989/
Abstract

Marine protected areas (MPAs) globally serve conservation and fisheries management goals, generating positive effects in some marine ecosystems. Surf zones and sandy beaches, critical ecotones bridging land and sea, play a pivotal role in the life cycles of numerous fish species and serve as prime areas for subsistence and recreational fishing. Despite their significance, these areas remain understudied when evaluating the effects of MPAs. We compared surf zone fish assemblages inside and outside MPAs across 3 bioregions in California (USA). Using seines and baited remote underwater videos (BRUVs), we found differences in surf zone fish inside and outside MPAs in one region. Inside south region MPAs, we observed higher abundance (Tukey's honest significant difference [HSD] = 0.83, p = 0.0001) and richness (HSD = 0.22, p = 0.0001) in BRUVs and greater biomass (HSD = 0.32, p = 0.0002) in seine surveys compared with reference sites. Selected live-bearing, fished taxa were positively affected by MPAs. Elasmobranchs displayed greater abundance in BRUV surveys and higher biomass in seine surveys inside south region MPAs (HSD = 0.35, p = 0.0003 and HSD = 0.23, p = 0.008, respectively). Although we observed no overall MPA signal for Embiotocidae, abundances of juvenile and large adult barred surfperch (Amphistichus argenteus), the most abundant fished species, were higher inside MPAs (K-S test D = 0.19, p < 0.0001). Influence of habitat characteristics on MPA performance indicated surf zone width was positively associated with fish abundance and biomass but negatively associated with richness. The south region had the largest positive effect size on all MPA performance metrics. Our findings underscored the variability in species richness and composition across regions and survey methods that significantly affected differences observed inside and outside MPAs. A comprehensive assessment of MPA performance should consider specific taxa, their distribution, and the effects of habitat factors and geography.

摘要

海洋保护区(MPAs)在全球范围内服务于保护和渔业管理目标,在一些海洋生态系统中产生了积极影响。冲浪区和沙滩是连接陆地和海洋的关键生态交错带,在许多鱼类的生命周期中起着至关重要的作用,是维持生计和娱乐性捕鱼的主要区域。尽管它们很重要,但在评估 MPAs 的影响时,这些区域的研究仍然不足。我们比较了加利福尼亚州(美国)三个生物区的 MPAs 内外冲浪区鱼类群落。使用网和诱饵远程水下视频(BRUV),我们发现一个区域的冲浪区鱼类在 MPAs 内外存在差异。在南部地区的 MPAs 内,我们观察到 BRUV 中的丰度(Tukey 诚实显著差异 [HSD] = 0.83,p = 0.0001)和丰富度(HSD = 0.22,p = 0.0001)较高,以及网捕调查中的生物量(HSD = 0.32,p = 0.0002)高于参考点。选定的胎生、捕捞类群受到 MPAs 的积极影响。在南部地区的 MPAs 内,BRUV 调查中的鲨鱼目鱼类丰度较高,网捕调查中的生物量较高(HSD = 0.35,p = 0.0003 和 HSD = 0.23,p = 0.008)。尽管我们没有观察到 Embiotocidae 的总体 MPA 信号,但幼鱼和大型成年 barred surfperch(Amphistichus argenteus)的数量较多,这是最常见的捕捞物种,在 MPAs 内更高(K-S 检验 D = 0.19,p < 0.0001)。生境特征对 MPA 性能的影响表明,冲浪区宽度与鱼类丰度和生物量呈正相关,但与丰富度呈负相关。南部地区对所有 MPA 性能指标的影响最大。我们的研究结果强调了物种丰富度和组成在不同地区和调查方法之间的可变性,这些方法显著影响了 MPAs 内外的差异。对 MPA 性能的全面评估应考虑特定的分类群、它们的分布以及生境因素和地理的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0983/11588989/e143989288fe/COBI-38-e14296-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0983/11588989/76bb51aeed79/COBI-38-e14296-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0983/11588989/f8ed73e605d6/COBI-38-e14296-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0983/11588989/ee305831885d/COBI-38-e14296-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0983/11588989/d51a51f5336a/COBI-38-e14296-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0983/11588989/ee0b1df67b6d/COBI-38-e14296-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0983/11588989/e143989288fe/COBI-38-e14296-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0983/11588989/76bb51aeed79/COBI-38-e14296-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0983/11588989/f8ed73e605d6/COBI-38-e14296-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0983/11588989/ee305831885d/COBI-38-e14296-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0983/11588989/d51a51f5336a/COBI-38-e14296-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0983/11588989/ee0b1df67b6d/COBI-38-e14296-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0983/11588989/e143989288fe/COBI-38-e14296-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating the influence of marine protected areas on surf zone fish.评估海洋保护区对冲浪区鱼类的影响。
Conserv Biol. 2024 Dec;38(6):e14296. doi: 10.1111/cobi.14296. Epub 2024 May 21.
2
A comparison of biomonitoring methodologies for surf zone fish communities.滩涂鱼类生物监测方法比较。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 14;18(6):e0260903. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260903. eCollection 2023.
3
Conservation benefits of a large marine protected area network that spans multiple ecosystems.跨越多个生态系统的大型海洋保护区网络的保护效益。
Conserv Biol. 2025 Aug;39(4):e14435. doi: 10.1111/cobi.14435. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
4
Limited differences in fish and benthic communities and possible cascading effects inside and outside a protected marine area in Sagres (SW Portugal).葡萄牙西南部萨格里什一个受保护海域内外鱼类和底栖生物群落的有限差异及可能的级联效应
Mar Environ Res. 2016 Mar;114:12-23. doi: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2015.12.003. Epub 2015 Dec 12.
5
Global conservation outcomes depend on marine protected areas with five key features.全球保护成果取决于具有五个关键特征的海洋保护区。
Nature. 2014 Feb 13;506(7487):216-20. doi: 10.1038/nature13022. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
6
Community- and government-managed marine protected areas increase fish size, biomass and potential value.社区和政府管理的海洋保护区可增加鱼类的大小、生物量和潜在价值。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 14;12(8):e0182342. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182342. eCollection 2017.
7
Enhancing fish Underwater Visual Census to move forward assessment of fish assemblages: An application in three Mediterranean Marine Protected Areas.加强鱼类水下视觉普查以推进鱼类群落评估:在地中海三个海洋保护区的应用
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 8;12(6):e0178511. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178511. eCollection 2017.
8
A marine protected area network does not confer community structure resilience to a marine heatwave across coastal ecosystems.海洋保护区网络并不能为沿海生态系统在海洋热浪中提供群落结构的恢复力。
Glob Chang Biol. 2023 Oct;29(19):5634-5651. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16862. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
9
Coupling ecology and GIS to evaluate efficacy of marine protected areas in Hawaii.结合生态学与地理信息系统评估夏威夷海洋保护区的成效。
Ecol Appl. 2007 Apr;17(3):715-30. doi: 10.1890/06-0536.
10
Temperate marine reserves enhance targeted but not untargeted fishes in multiple no-take MPAs.温带海洋保护区增加了多个禁捕海洋保护区内的目标鱼类,但未增加非目标鱼类。
Ecol Appl. 2007 Dec;17(8):2251-67. doi: 10.1890/06-0161.1.

引用本文的文献

1
Conservation benefits of a large marine protected area network that spans multiple ecosystems.跨越多个生态系统的大型海洋保护区网络的保护效益。
Conserv Biol. 2025 Aug;39(4):e14435. doi: 10.1111/cobi.14435. Epub 2025 Jan 9.