Suppr超能文献

心脏植入式电子设备患者的脉冲场消融:安全性的体外评估

Pulsed field ablation in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: an ex vivo assessment of safety.

作者信息

Lennerz Carsten, O'Connor Matthew, Schaarschmidt Claudia, Reents Tilko, Bourier Felix, Telishevska Marta, Lengauer Sarah, Popa Miruna, Wimbauer Katharina, Holmgren Ellen, Thoma Mara, Spitzauer Lovis, Bahlke Fabian, Krafft Hannah, Englert Florian, Knoll Katharina, Friedrich Lena, Blazek Patrick, Hessling Gabriele, Kolb Christof, Deisenhofer Isabel, Kottmaier Marc

机构信息

Department of Electrophysiology, German Heart Centre Munich, Technical University of Munich, Lazarettstr. 36, 80636, Munich, Germany.

DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2024 May 22. doi: 10.1007/s10840-024-01758-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pulse field ablation (PFA) is a novel catheter ablation technology with potential safety benefits due to its tissue selectivity. It has the potential to directly damage or interact with the functionality of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) in the form of electromagnetic interference (EMI). The aim of our study was to assess the impact of PFA on CIEDs.

METHODS

PFA lesions (45 per CIED) were applied from the Farapulse system to CIEDs (< 5 cm from the lead tip and < 15 cm from the generator). All devices were checked before and after PFA application for proper sensing and pacing functionality as well as for integrity of shock circuits in ICDs using a heart simulator. Moreover, devices were then interrogated for any spontaneous reprogramming, mode switching or other EMI effects.

RESULTS

In total, 44 CIEDs were tested (16 pacemaker, 21 ICDs, 7 CRT-P/D) with 1980 PFA applications. There was no change in device settings, functionality and electrical parameters, and there was no macroscopic damage to the devices. The risk of damage to the electric components or leads on a patient-based analysis is 0/44 (95% CI 0-8%) and on a PFA pulse-based analysis is 0/1980 (95% CI 0-0.2%). Clinically relevant EMI appeared with oversensing and pacing inhibition but not tachycardia detection.

CONCLUSIONS

Bipolar PFA appears safe and does not result in damage to CIEDs or leads. Clinically relevant EMI does occur, but appropriate peri-procedural programming may mitigate this. In vivo studies are needed to confirm our findings.

摘要

背景

脉冲场消融(PFA)是一种新型导管消融技术,因其组织选择性而具有潜在的安全优势。它有可能以电磁干扰(EMI)的形式直接损害心脏植入式电子设备(CIED)的功能或与之相互作用。我们研究的目的是评估PFA对CIED的影响。

方法

使用Farapulse系统对CIED(距导线尖端<5 cm且距发生器<15 cm)施加PFA损伤(每个CIED 45次)。在施加PFA前后,使用心脏模拟器检查所有设备的正确感知和起搏功能以及ICD中除颤电路的完整性。此外,随后对设备进行询问,以检查是否有任何自发重新编程、模式切换或其他EMI效应。

结果

总共测试了44个CIED(16个起搏器、21个ICD、7个CRT-P/D),进行了1980次PFA应用。设备设置、功能和电气参数没有变化,设备也没有宏观损坏。基于患者分析,电子元件或导线受损的风险为0/44(95%CI 0-8%),基于PFA脉冲分析为0/1980(95%CI 0-0.2%)。临床上相关的EMI表现为感知过度和起搏抑制,但未出现心动过速检测异常。

结论

双极PFA似乎是安全的,不会导致CIED或导线损坏。临床上确实会出现相关的EMI,但适当的围手术期程控可能会减轻这种情况。需要进行体内研究来证实我们的发现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验