Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Center for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024 Aug;26(8):3403-3417. doi: 10.1111/dom.15682. Epub 2024 May 23.
Studies examining the safety and effectiveness of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) versus glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) among community-dwelling adults may not generalize to nursing home (NH) residents, who are typically older and more multimorbid. We compared the safety and cardiovascular effectiveness of SGLT2is and GLP-1RAs among US NH residents.
Eligible individuals were aged ≥66 years with type 2 diabetes mellitus and initiated an SGLT2i or GLP-1RA in an NH between 2013 and 2018. Safety outcomes included fall-related injuries, hypoglycaemia, diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), urinary tract infection or genital infection, and acute kidney injury in the year following treatment initiation. Cardiovascular effectiveness outcomes included death, major adverse cardiovascular events and hospitalization for heart failure. Per-protocol adjusted hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using stabilized inverse probability of treatment and censoring weighted cause-specific hazard regression models accounting for 127 covariates.
The study population included 7710 residents (31.08% SGLT2i, 68.92% GLP-1RA). Compared with GLP-1RA initiators, SGLT2i initiators had higher rates of DKA (HR 1.95, 95% confidence limits 1.27, 2.99) and death (HR 1.18, 95% confidence limits 1.02, 1.36). Rates of urinary tract infection or genital infection, acute kidney injury, major adverse cardiovascular events, and heart failure were also elevated, while rates of fall-related injuries and hypoglycaemia were reduced, but all estimates were imprecise and highly compatible with no difference.
SGLT2is do not have superior, and may have inferior, effectiveness compared with GLP-1RAs for cardiovascular and mortality outcomes in NH residents. Residents initiating SGLT2is should be monitored closely for DKA.
在社区居住的成年人中,研究钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂(SGLT2is)与胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂(GLP-1RAs)的安全性和有效性的研究结果可能无法推广到养老院(NH)居民,因为 NH 居民通常年龄更大且合并症更多。我们比较了 SGLT2is 和 GLP-1RAs 在 NH 居民中的安全性和心血管有效性。
符合条件的个体年龄≥66 岁,患有 2 型糖尿病,于 2013 年至 2018 年在 NH 中开始接受 SGLT2i 或 GLP-1RA 治疗。安全性结果包括与跌倒相关的伤害、低血糖、糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)、尿路感染或生殖器感染以及治疗开始后一年内的急性肾损伤。心血管有效性结果包括死亡、主要不良心血管事件和心力衰竭住院治疗。使用稳定的逆概率治疗和按时间校正的协变量特定风险回归模型,计算了治疗开始后一年的按方案调整后的危险比(HR)。
研究人群包括 7710 名居民(31.08% SGLT2i,68.92% GLP-1RA)。与 GLP-1RA 起始者相比,SGLT2i 起始者的 DKA 发生率更高(HR 1.95,95%置信区间 1.27,2.99)和死亡率(HR 1.18,95%置信区间 1.02,1.36)。尿路感染或生殖器感染、急性肾损伤、主要不良心血管事件和心力衰竭的发生率也有所升高,而跌倒相关伤害和低血糖的发生率则降低,但所有估计均不准确,且与无差异高度一致。
在 NH 居民中,SGLT2is 在心血管和死亡率方面与 GLP-1RAs 相比,没有优势,甚至可能处于劣势。开始使用 SGLT2is 的居民应密切监测 DKA。