Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Rotterdam, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Medical Imaging Center, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Eur Radiol. 2024 Nov;34(11):7429-7437. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10806-4. Epub 2024 May 24.
The aim of our current systematic dynamic phantom study was first, to optimize reconstruction parameters of coronary CTA (CCTA) acquired on photon counting CT (PCCT) for coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring, and second, to assess the feasibility of calculating CAC scores from CCTA, in comparison to reference calcium scoring CT (CSCT) scans.
In this phantom study, an artificial coronary artery was translated at velocities corresponding to 0, < 60, and 60-75 beats per minute (bpm) within an anthropomorphic phantom. The density of calcifications was 100 (very low), 200 (low), 400 (medium), and 800 (high) mgHA/cm, respectively. CCTA was reconstructed with the following parameters: virtual non-iodine (VNI), with and without iterative reconstruction (QIR level 2, QIR off, respectively); kernels Qr36 and Qr44f; slice thickness/increment 3.0/1.5 mm and 0.4/0.2 mm. The agreement in risk group classification between CAC and CAC scoring was measured using Cohen weighted linear κ with 95% CI.
For CCTA reconstructed with 0.4 mm slice thickness, calcium detectability was perfect (100%). At < 60 bpm, CAC of low, and medium density calcification was underestimated by 53%, and 15%, respectively. However, CAC was not significantly different from CAC of very low, and high-density calcifications. The best risk agreement was achieved when CCTA was reconstructed with QIR off, Qr44f, and 0.4 mm slice thickness (κ = 0.762, 95% CI 0.671-0.853).
In this dynamic phantom study, the detection of calcifications with different densities was excellent with CCTA on PCCT using thin-slice VNI reconstruction. Agatston scores were underestimated compared to CSCT but agreement in risk classification was substantial.
Photon counting CT may enable the implementation of coronary artery calcium scoring from coronary CTA in daily clinical practice.
Photon-counting CTA allows for excellent detectability of low-density calcifications at all heart rates. Coronary artery calcium scoring from coronary CTA acquired on photon counting CT is feasible, although improvement is needed. Adoption of the standard acquisition and reconstruction protocol for calcium scoring is needed for improved quantification of coronary artery calcium to fully employ the potential of photon counting CT.
我们目前的系统动态体模研究的目的首先是优化在光子计数 CT(PCCT)上获得的冠状动脉 CT 血管造影(CCTA)的重建参数,以用于冠状动脉钙化(CAC)评分,其次是评估从 CCTA 计算 CAC 评分的可行性,与参考钙评分 CT(CSCT)扫描相比。
在这项体模研究中,在人体模型内以对应于 0、<60 和 60-75 次/分钟(bpm)的速度平移人工冠状动脉。钙化的密度分别为 100(极低)、200(低)、400(中)和 800(高)mgHA/cm。用以下参数重建 CCTA:虚拟非碘(VNI),带和不带迭代重建(QIR 水平 2、QIR 关闭);Qr36 和 Qr44f 核;层厚/增量 3.0/1.5mm 和 0.4/0.2mm。使用 95%置信区间的 Cohen 加权线性 κ 测量 CAC 和 CAC 评分之间的风险组分类一致性。
对于 0.4mm 层厚重建的 CCTA,钙检测率为 100%。在<60bpm 时,低和中密度钙化的 CAC 分别低估了 53%和 15%。然而,CAC 与极低和高密度钙化没有显著差异。当 CCTA 用 QIR 关闭、Qr44f 和 0.4mm 层厚重建时,风险评估的最佳一致性(κ=0.762,95%CI 0.671-0.853)。
在这项动态体模研究中,使用 PCCT 上的薄切片 VNI 重建,不同密度的钙化检测效果非常好。与 CSCT 相比,Agatston 评分被低估,但风险分类的一致性是实质性的。
光子计数 CT 可能使冠状动脉 CT 血管造影的冠状动脉钙评分在日常临床实践中得以实现。
光子计数 CT 可在所有心率下实现对低密度钙化的优异检测能力。从光子计数 CT 上获得的冠状动脉 CT 血管造影的冠状动脉钙评分是可行的,但需要改进。需要采用标准的钙评分采集和重建方案,以提高冠状动脉钙的定量水平,充分发挥光子计数 CT 的潜力。