Urban Innovation and Sustainability, Department of Development and Sustainability, School of Environment Resources and Development, Asian Institute of Technology, Klong Luang 12120, Pathum Thani, Thailand.
Faculty of Public Health, Mahidol University Amnatcharoen Campus, Muang 37000, Amnat Charoen, Thailand.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 May 18;21(5):644. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21050644.
Environmental impact assessment (EIA) performance has remained of interest, and over the past ten years, the evaluation technique has evolved. Thailand implemented an EIA with a health impact assessment (HIA) as an environmental health impact assessment (EHIA), which necessitated investigating and developing these instruments; however, its implementation performance has been questioned. The main goal of this study is to comparatively assess how well EIAs and EHIAs are performed in projects in an area in Thailand. Six projects in various sectors that were implemented in Eastern Thailand were studied. The 162 residents (nine local authorities and 153 villagers) closest to the project completed a survey and evaluated the performance according to three aspects (i.e., substantive, procedural, and transactive), using a rating scale and evaluation checklists. The results were presented as a percentage of the total scores and interpreted according to the five scales. The overall performance reached a satisfactory level, albeit not significantly different between cases; however, it was pointed out that the shortcomings of EHIAs and EIAs, particularly their dependability, lack of public involvement, and the need for more transparency, could be addressed through the establishment of an open access database, which would help to simplify the assessment of all stages of EIAs and EHIAs.
环境影响评估 (EIA) 的绩效一直备受关注,在过去的十年中,评估技术不断发展。泰国实施了一项包含健康影响评估 (HIA) 的 EIA,作为环境健康影响评估 (EHIA),这需要对这些工具进行调查和开发;然而,其实施绩效受到了质疑。本研究的主要目的是比较评估泰国某地区项目中 EIA 和 EHIA 的执行情况。研究了泰国东部六个不同部门的项目。最接近项目的 162 名居民(九个地方当局和 153 名村民)完成了一项调查,并根据三个方面(实质性、程序性和交易性)使用评分量表和评估检查表对绩效进行了评估。结果以总分的百分比表示,并根据五个量表进行解释。整体绩效达到了令人满意的水平,尽管案例之间没有显著差异;然而,有人指出,EHIA 和 EIA 的缺点,特别是其可靠性、缺乏公众参与以及需要提高透明度,可以通过建立一个开放获取数据库来解决,这将有助于简化 EIA 和 EHIA 所有阶段的评估。