Division of Ophthalmology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Scheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Department of Ophthalmology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Ophthalmology. 2024 Nov;131(11):1297-1303. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2024.05.019. Epub 2024 May 23.
The International Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity, Third Edition (ICROP3), acknowledged that plus-like retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) vascular changes occurs along a spectrum. Historically, clinician-experts demonstrate variable agreement for plus diagnosis. We developed a 9-photograph reference image set for grading plus-like changes and compared intergrader agreement of the set with standard grading with no plus, preplus, and plus disease.
Retinal photographic grading and expert consensus opinion.
The development set included 34 international ICROP3 committee members. The validation set included 30 ophthalmologists with ROP expertise (15 ICROP3 committee members and 15 non-ICROP3 members) METHODS: Nine ROP fundus images (P1 through P9) representing increasing degrees of zone I vascular tortuosity and dilation, based on the 34 ICROP3 committee members' gradings and consensus image reviews, were used to establish standard photographs for the plus (P) score. Study participants graded 150 fundus photographs 2 ways, separated by a 1-week washout period: (1) no plus, preplus, or plus disease and (2) choosing the closest P score image.
Intergrader agreement measured by intraclass correlation coefficient.
Intergrader agreement was higher using the P score (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.79) than no plus, preplus, or plus disease (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.62-0.72). Mean ± standard deviation P scores for images with mode gradings of no plus, preplus, and plus disease were 2.5 ± 0.7, 4.8 ± 0.8, and 7.4 ± 0.8, respectively.
Intergrader agreement of plus-like vascular change in ROP using the P score is high. We now incorporate this 9-image reference set into ICROP3 for use in clinician daily practice alongside zone, stage, and plus assessment. P score is not yet meant to replace plus diagnosis for treatment decisions, but its use at our institutions has permitted better comparison between examinations for progression and regression, communication between examiners, and documentation of vascular change without fundus imaging. P score also could provide more detailed ROP classification for clinical trials, consistent with the spectrum of plus-like change that is now formally part of the International Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity.
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
国际早产儿视网膜病变分类(ICROP3)第三版承认,早产儿视网膜病变(ROP)的类似加号病变的血管变化呈连续谱分布。从历史上看,临床医生专家对加号的诊断存在可变的一致性。我们开发了一套 9 张照片参考图像集,用于分级类似加号的病变,并将该图像集的分级与不分级、前加号和加号疾病的标准分级进行了比较。
视网膜摄影分级和专家共识意见。
发展集包括 34 名国际 ICROP3 委员会成员。验证集包括 30 名具有 ROP 专业知识的眼科医生(15 名 ICROP3 委员会成员和 15 名非 ICROP3 成员)。
基于 34 名 ICROP3 委员会成员的分级和共识图像审查,使用 9 张ROP 眼底图像(P1 至 P9)来建立加号(P)评分的标准照片,这些图像代表了 I 区血管扭曲和扩张程度的增加。研究参与者在 1 周洗脱期后以 2 种方式对 150 张眼底照片进行分级:(1)无加号、前加号或加号疾病,(2)选择最接近的 P 评分图像。
组内一致性用组内相关系数衡量。
使用 P 评分的组内一致性更高(组内相关系数,0.75;95%置信区间,0.71-0.79),而非无加号、前加号或加号疾病(组内相关系数,0.67;95%置信区间,0.62-0.72)。模式分级为无加号、前加号和加号疾病的图像的平均±标准差 P 评分分别为 2.5±0.7、4.8±0.8 和 7.4±0.8。
ROP 中类似加号的血管变化使用 P 评分的组内一致性较高。我们现在将这个 9 张图像参考集纳入 ICROP3,以便在临床实践中与区域、分期和加号评估一起使用。P 评分目前还不能用于治疗决策中的加号诊断,但在我们机构的使用已经允许更好地比较进展和消退之间的检查,检查者之间的沟通,以及在没有眼底成像的情况下记录血管变化。P 评分还可以为临床试验提供更详细的 ROP 分类,与现在正式成为国际早产儿视网膜病变分类一部分的类似加号变化谱一致。
在本文结尾的脚注和披露中可能会发现专有或商业披露信息。