North Wales Centre for Primary Care Research (NWCPCR), Bangor University, Wrexham.
Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff.
Br J Gen Pract. 2024 Jul 25;74(745):e544-e551. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2023.0339. Print 2024 Aug.
UK cancer mortality is worse than in many other high-income countries, partly because of diagnostic delays in primary care.
To understand beliefs and behaviours of GPs, and systems of general practice teams, to inform the Think Cancer! intervention development.
An embedded qualitative study guided by behaviour change models (COM-B [Capability, Opportunity, Motivation - Behaviour] and theoretical domains framework [TDF]) in primary care in Wales, UK.
Twenty qualitative, semi-structured telephone interviews with GPs were undertaken and four face-to-face focus groups held with practice teams. Framework analysis was used and results were mapped to multiple, overlapping components of COM-B and TDF.
Three themes illustrate complex, multilevel referral considerations facing GPs and practice teams; external influences and constraints; and the role of practice systems and culture. Tensions emerged between individual considerations of GPs (Capability and Motivation) and context-dependent external pressures (Opportunity). Detecting cancer was guided not only by external requirements, but also by motivational factors GPs described as part of their cancer diagnostics process. External influences on the diagnosis process often resulted from the primary-secondary care interface and social pressures. GPs adapted their behaviour to deal with this disconnect. Positive practice culture and supportive practice-based systems ameliorated these tensions and complexity.
By exploring individual GP behaviours together with practice systems and culture we contribute new understanding about how cancer diagnosis operates in primary care and how delays can be improved. We highlight commonly overlooked dynamics and tensions that are experienced by GPs as a tension between individual decision making (Capability and Motivation) and external considerations, such as pressures in secondary care (Opportunity).
英国的癌症死亡率比许多其他高收入国家都要差,部分原因是初级保健中的诊断延误。
了解全科医生的信念和行为,以及全科医生团队的系统,为“Think Cancer!”干预措施的制定提供信息。
在英国威尔士的初级保健中,一项基于行为改变模型(COM-B [能力、机会、动机-行为]和理论领域框架 [TDF])的嵌入式定性研究。
对 20 名全科医生进行了 20 次定性、半结构式电话访谈,并与实践团队进行了 4 次面对面焦点小组讨论。采用框架分析,结果映射到多个重叠的 COM-B 和 TDF 组件。
三个主题说明了全科医生和实践团队面临的复杂的、多层次的转诊考虑因素;外部影响和约束;以及实践系统和文化的作用。个体考虑因素(能力和动机)和依赖于背景的外部压力(机会)之间出现了紧张关系。发现癌症不仅受到外部要求的指导,还受到全科医生描述为其癌症诊断过程一部分的激励因素的指导。诊断过程中的外部影响往往源于初级保健和二级保健之间的接口以及社会压力。全科医生调整了他们的行为来应对这种脱节。积极的实践文化和支持性的基于实践的系统减轻了这些紧张关系和复杂性。
通过探索个体全科医生的行为以及实践系统和文化,我们对癌症诊断在初级保健中的运作方式以及如何改善延迟有了新的理解。我们强调了经常被忽视的动态和紧张关系,这些紧张关系是由个体决策(能力和动机)和外部考虑因素(如二级保健中的压力)之间的紧张关系引起的。