University of Calgary, Department of Family Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
University of Calgary, Department of Community Health Sciences, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Ann Fam Med. 2024 May-Jun;22(3):223-229. doi: 10.1370/afm.3107.
Continuity of care is broadly associated with better patient health outcomes. The relative contributions of continuity with an individual physician and with a practice, however, have not generally been distinguished. This retrospective observational study examined the impact of continuity of care for patients seen at their main clinic but by different family physicians.
We analyzed linked health administrative data from 2015-2018 from Alberta, Canada to explore the association of physician and clinic continuity with rates of emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations across varying levels of patient complexity. Physician continuity was calculated using the known provider of care index and clinic continuity with an analogous measure. We developed zero-inflated negative binomial models to assess the association of each with all-cause ED visits and hospitalizations.
High physician continuity was associated with lower ED use across all levels of patient complexity and with fewer hospitalizations for highly complex patients. Broadly, no (0%) clinic continuity was associated with increased use and complete (100%) clinic continuity with decreased use, with the largest effect seen for the most complex patients. Levels of clinic continuity between 1% and 50% were generally associated with slightly higher use, and levels of 51% to 99% with slightly lower use.
The best health care outcomes (measured by ED visits and hospitalizations) are associated with consistently seeing one's own primary family physician or seeing a clinic partner when that physician is unavailable. The effect of partial clinic continuity appears complex and requires additional research. These results provide some reassurance for part-time and shared practices, and guidance for primary care workforce policy makers.
医疗连续性与患者健康结果的改善密切相关。然而,个体医生连续性和实践连续性的相对贡献尚未得到普遍区分。本回顾性观察研究考察了在主要就诊诊所由不同家庭医生接诊的患者的医疗连续性对急诊就诊率和住院率的影响。
我们分析了来自加拿大艾伯塔省 2015-2018 年的链接健康行政数据,以探索在不同患者复杂程度水平下,医生连续性和诊所连续性与急诊就诊率和住院率的关联。医生连续性使用已知提供者护理指数计算,诊所连续性使用类似的衡量标准。我们开发了零膨胀负二项模型,以评估每种连续性与所有原因急诊就诊率和住院率的关联。
高医生连续性与所有患者复杂程度水平的急诊就诊率降低相关,与高度复杂患者的住院率降低相关。广泛而言,完全(100%)诊所连续性与就诊减少相关,而几乎没有(0%)诊所连续性与就诊增加相关,这种影响在最复杂的患者中最大。1%至 50%的诊所连续性水平通常与就诊略高相关,而 51%至 99%的连续性水平与就诊略低相关。
(通过急诊就诊率和住院率来衡量)最佳的医疗保健结果与始终由自己的初级家庭医生就诊或在该医生无法接诊时由诊所合作伙伴接诊相关。部分诊所连续性的影响似乎较为复杂,需要进一步研究。这些结果为兼职和共享实践提供了一些保证,并为初级保健劳动力政策制定者提供了指导。