School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
Population, Policy and Practice Department, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2024 Nov;32(11):1436-1445. doi: 10.1038/s41431-024-01636-5. Epub 2024 May 28.
Whole genome sequencing (WGS) is being used in diagnostic testing for certain clinical indications within the NHS Genomic Medicine Service (GMS) in England. Letter writing is an integral part of delivering results. However, no national guidelines for writing results from WGS exist. This multi-centre service evaluation used mixed methods to understand the content and readability of letters returning diagnostic, variant of uncertain significance (VUS), and no-finding results to paediatric rare disease patients. Eight Regional Genetics Services (response rate 47%) in England provided a total of 37 letters returning diagnostic (n = 13), VUS (n = 10), and no-finding (n = 14) results. Diagnostic and VUS results were usually delivered during an appointment; no-finding results were typically delivered by letter only. Letters were diverse in which content topics they covered and level of detail. No-finding letters (14/14) explained the result but were less likely to cover other topics. Diagnostic letters discussed the result (13/13), the condition (13/13), clinical genetics follow-up (13/13), clinical management (10/13), and adapting to the result (9/13). VUS letters explained the result (10/10), diagnostic uncertainty (10/10), and clinical genetics follow-up (10/10). Uncertainty was a common component of letters (33/37), irrespective of the result. Reanalysis or review after one or more years was suggested in 6/13 diagnostic, 7/10 VUS, and 6/14 no-finding letters. The mean reading level of letters corresponded to 15-17 years. Understanding how WGS results are conveyed to families during appointments, as well as how families interpret that information, is needed to provide a more comprehensive overview of results communication and inform best practices.
全基因组测序(WGS)正在英国国民保健制度(NHS)基因组医学服务(GMS)的某些临床适应症的诊断测试中使用。信件书写是提供结果的一个组成部分。然而,目前还没有针对 WGS 结果书写的国家指南。这项多中心服务评估采用混合方法,了解向儿科罕见病患者发送诊断结果、意义不明的变异(VUS)结果和无发现结果的信件的内容和可读性。英格兰的 8 个区域遗传服务(响应率为 47%)共提供了 37 封返回诊断结果(n=13)、VUS 结果(n=10)和无发现结果(n=14)的信件。诊断和 VUS 结果通常在预约时提供;无发现结果通常仅通过信件提供。信件的内容主题和详细程度各不相同。无发现结果的信件(14/14)解释了结果,但不太可能涵盖其他主题。诊断信件讨论了结果(13/13)、病情(13/13)、临床遗传学随访(13/13)、临床管理(10/13)和适应结果(9/13)。VUS 信件解释了结果(10/10)、诊断不确定性(10/10)和临床遗传学随访(10/10)。无论结果如何,不确定性都是信件的常见内容(33/37)。在 6/13 份诊断、7/10 份 VUS 和 6/14 份无发现结果的信件中建议进行一次或多次重新分析或复查。信件的平均阅读水平相当于 15-17 岁。了解 WGS 结果如何在预约期间传达给家庭,以及家庭如何解释这些信息,这对于提供更全面的结果沟通概述并为最佳实践提供信息是必要的。