Suppr超能文献

监测动机式访谈策略:创建提供方和客户报告以鼓励实施。

Monitoring Motivational Interviewing Strategies: Creating Provider and Client Reports to Encourage Implementation.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Rhode Island, Rhode Island, USA.

Behavioral Sciences Department, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912.

出版信息

Subst Use Misuse. 2024;59(10):1519-1526. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2024.2360101. Epub 2024 May 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Motivational interviewing (MI) is an evidence-based practice that has been successfully applied to at-risk youth. Well-validated measures that track MI integrity may not be used in practice settings due to the time to complete them, recording requirements and training involved. A simpler, less resource-intensive instrument may encourage programs and providers to attend more to the quality of MI use during implementation.

PURPOSE

To validate a method involving two measures, Youth and Provider Logs, to assist in monitoring MI use.

METHODS

Clients and providers reported on provider behaviors consistent and inconsistent with MI during the session. Factor analyses were conducted to examine whether measures showed clear scales assessing MI use and analyses were conducted to assess validity of these measures.

RESULTS

Both Youth and Provider Logs showed a clear and consistent 3-factor structure assessing MI-consistent behavior, MI-inconsistent behavior, and alcohol-related topics. Significant correlations were found between Youth Logs and youth reports of rapport with providers, and satisfaction with services. Provider MI-inconsistent scores were significantly inversely predictive of observer fidelity scores over time.

CONCLUSION

This study offers provider and client measures for tracking use of MI in sessions, which are a simpler, less resource-intensive method for monitoring MI, and may encourage fidelity during implementation.

摘要

背景

动机访谈(MI)是一种基于证据的实践方法,已成功应用于高危青少年。由于完成时间、记录要求和培训等原因,虽然有经过良好验证、可追踪 MI 完整性的测量工具,但在实际环境中可能无法使用。一种更简单、资源占用较少的工具可能会鼓励项目和提供者在实施过程中更加关注 MI 使用的质量。

目的

验证一种涉及两种测量工具(青少年日志和提供者日志)的方法,以协助监测 MI 的使用。

方法

客户和提供者在会话期间报告与 MI 一致和不一致的提供者行为。进行因子分析以检查这些测量工具是否能清晰地评估 MI 使用的情况,并进行分析以评估这些测量工具的有效性。

结果

青少年日志和提供者日志都显示了一个清晰且一致的 3 因素结构,评估 MI 一致行为、MI 不一致行为和与酒精相关的话题。青少年日志中的提供者 MI 不一致得分与青少年对提供者的融洽度和对服务的满意度之间存在显著的相关性。提供者的 MI 不一致评分与观察者的保真度评分呈显著的负相关。

结论

本研究提供了用于跟踪会话中 MI 使用情况的提供者和客户测量工具,这是一种更简单、资源占用较少的监测 MI 的方法,可能会在实施过程中鼓励保真度。

相似文献

1
Monitoring Motivational Interviewing Strategies: Creating Provider and Client Reports to Encourage Implementation.
Subst Use Misuse. 2024;59(10):1519-1526. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2024.2360101. Epub 2024 May 30.
3
Motivational interviewing for substance use reduction.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Dec 12;12(12):CD008063. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008063.pub3.
4
Motivational interviewing for alcohol misuse in young adults.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Aug 21(8):CD007025. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007025.pub2.
5
Motivational interviewing for the prevention of alcohol misuse in young adults.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 18;7(7):CD007025. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007025.pub4.
6
Motivational interviewing for smoking cessation.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 2(3):CD006936. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006936.pub3.
7
Psychosocial interventions for benzodiazepine harmful use, abuse or dependence.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2015(5):CD009652. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009652.pub2.
9
Theory-based interventions for contraception.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 23;11(11):CD007249. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007249.pub5.
10
Consumer-providers of care for adult clients of statutory mental health services.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28;2013(3):CD004807. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004807.pub2.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Algorithmic jingle jungle: A comparison of implementations of principal axis factoring and promax rotation in R and SPSS.
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Feb;54(1):54-74. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01581-x. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
2
A Systematic Review of Motivational Interviewing to Address Substance Use with Justice-Involved Adults.
Subst Use Misuse. 2021;56(5):639-649. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2021.1887247. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
3
Motivational interviewing quality assurance: A systematic review of assessment tools across research contexts.
Clin Psychol Rev. 2020 Dec;82:101909. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101909. Epub 2020 Sep 6.
4
Assessment of motivational interviewing: Psychometric characteristics of the MITS 2.1 in general practice.
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Jul;103(7):1311-1318. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.02.009. Epub 2020 Feb 15.
5
Motivational interviewing for smoking cessation.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 31;7(7):CD006936. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006936.pub4.
6
Constructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments.
Psychol Assess. 2019 Dec;31(12):1412-1427. doi: 10.1037/pas0000626. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
7
A multivariate meta-analysis of motivational interviewing process and outcome.
Psychol Addict Behav. 2017 Aug;31(5):524-533. doi: 10.1037/adb0000280. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
8
A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
10
The Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity Code (MITI 4): Rationale, Preliminary Reliability and Validity.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2016 Jun;65:36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2016.01.001. Epub 2016 Jan 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验