Alexandre Marie, Prague Mélanie, Lhomme Edouard, Lelièvre Jean-Daniel, Wittkop Linda, Richert Laura, Lévy Yves, Thiébaut Rodolphe
Department of Public Health, University of Bordeaux, Inserm U1219 Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Inria Statistics in Systems Biology and Translational Medicine (SISTM), Bordeaux, France.
Vaccine Research Institute, Créteil, France.
Clin Infect Dis. 2024 Dec 17;79(6):1447-1457. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciae235.
Analytical treatment interruption (ATI) is the gold standard in HIV research for assessing the capability of new therapeutic strategies to control viremia without antiretroviral treatment (ART). The viral setpoint is commonly used as endpoint to evaluate their efficacy. However, in line with recommendations from a consensus meeting, to minimize the risk of increased viremia without ART, trials often implement short ATI phases and stringent virological ART restart criteria. This approach can limit the accurate observation of the setpoint.
We analyzed viral dynamics in 235 people with HIV from 3 trials, examining virological criteria during ATI phases. Time-related (eg time to rebound, peak, and setpoint) and viral load magnitude-related criteria (peak, setpoint, and time-averaged AUC [nAUC]) were described. Spearman correlations were analyzed to identify (1) surrogate endpoints for setpoint and (2) optimal virological ART restart criteria mitigating the risks of ART interruption and the evaluation of viral control.
Comparison of virological criteria between trials showed strong dependencies on ATI design. Similar correlations were found across trials, with nAUC the most strongly correlated with the setpoint, with correlations >0.70. A threshold >100 000 copies/mL for 2 consecutive measures is requested as a virological ART restart criterion.
Our results are in line with recommendations and emphasize the benefits of an ATI phase >12 weeks, with regular monitoring, and a virological ART restart criterion of 10 000 copies/mL to limit the risk for patients while capturing enough information to keep nAUC as an optimal proxy to the setpoint.
分析性治疗中断(ATI)是HIV研究中评估新治疗策略在无抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)情况下控制病毒血症能力的金标准。病毒载量设定点通常用作评估其疗效的终点。然而,根据一次共识会议的建议,为了将无ART时病毒血症增加的风险降至最低,试验通常采用短ATI阶段和严格的病毒学ART重新启动标准。这种方法可能会限制对设定点的准确观察。
我们分析了来自3项试验的235名HIV感染者的病毒动力学,检查了ATI阶段的病毒学标准。描述了与时间相关的标准(如反弹时间、峰值时间和设定点时间)以及与病毒载量大小相关的标准(峰值、设定点和时间平均AUC[nAUC])。分析了Spearman相关性,以确定(1)设定点的替代终点,以及(2)减轻ART中断风险和评估病毒控制的最佳病毒学ART重新启动标准。
试验间病毒学标准的比较显示出对ATI设计的强烈依赖性。在各项试验中发现了相似的相关性,nAUC与设定点的相关性最强,相关性>0.70。要求连续两次测量的阈值>100000拷贝/mL作为病毒学ART重新启动标准。
我们的结果符合建议,并强调了超过12周的ATI阶段、定期监测以及10000拷贝/mL的病毒学ART重新启动标准的益处,以限制患者的风险,同时获取足够的信息以将nAUC作为设定点的最佳替代指标。