Suppr超能文献

RefluxStop 装置治疗瑞士难治性胃食管反流病的成本效益分析。

Cost-effectiveness of the RefluxStop device for management of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease in Switzerland.

机构信息

York Health Economics Consortium, York, UK.

Implantica AG, Zug, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Med Econ. 2024 Jan-Dec;27(1):805-815. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2024.2362564. Epub 2024 Jun 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

One of the most prevalent conditions in Western societies is gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). In Switzerland, the standard treatment for GERD is proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based medical management, but surgical options such as Nissen fundoplication and magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) are available. RefluxStop is a novel device that offers an alternative solution. The purpose of this report is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of RefluxStop compared to PPIs and existing surgical treatments.

METHODS

A model (Markov) was developed using the Swiss healthcare payer perspective with a lifetime horizon, 1-month cycle length, and a 3% annual discount rate for costs and benefits. Adverse events specific to treatment arms were incorporated, and benefits were measured in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Clinical efficacy data for RefluxStop was obtained from its CE mark study, and comparator treatments were based on published literature. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were used to explore uncertainty. Since there are no head-to-head studies between RefluxStop and PPI therapy, Nissen fundoplication, or MSA, a limitation of this study is the use of naïve, indirect comparison of clinical effectiveness between the studied treatment options.

RESULTS

Higher QALYs and lower costs were provided by RefluxStop compared to Nissen fundoplication and the MSA system. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for RefluxStop was CHF 2,116 in comparison to PPI-based medical management. At a cost-effectiveness threshold of CHF 100,000 per QALY gained, the probability of RefluxStop being cost-effective was high, with probabilities of 100%, 97%, and 100% against PPI-based medical management, Nissen fundoplication, and MSA, respectively. The robustness of the analysis was provided by deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSION

This cost-effectiveness analysis demonstrates that there is a high likelihood of RefluxStop being a cost-effective treatment modality in adults with GERD when compared with other treatment options available in Switzerland.

摘要

背景

在西方社会,最普遍的疾病之一是胃食管反流病(GERD)。在瑞士,GERD 的标准治疗方法是质子泵抑制剂(PPI)为基础的药物治疗,但也有手术选择,如 Nissen 胃底折叠术和磁括约肌增强术(MSA)。RefluxStop 是一种提供替代解决方案的新型设备。本报告旨在评估 RefluxStop 与 PPI 和现有手术治疗相比的成本效益。

方法

使用瑞士医疗保健支付者的视角,建立了一个具有终生时间范围、1 个月的周期长度和每年 3%的成本和效益贴现率的模型(马尔可夫模型)。纳入了针对特定治疗方案的不良事件,并且使用质量调整生命年(QALY)来衡量效益。RefluxStop 的临床疗效数据来自其 CE 标志研究,而比较治疗方法则基于已发表的文献。使用确定性和概率敏感性分析来探索不确定性。由于没有 RefluxStop 与 PPI 治疗、Nissen 胃底折叠术或 MSA 之间的头对头研究,因此本研究的局限性在于对所研究的治疗方案之间的临床疗效进行了未经修饰的间接比较。

结果

与 Nissen 胃底折叠术和 MSA 系统相比,RefluxStop 提供了更高的 QALYs 和更低的成本。RefluxStop 与基于 PPI 的药物治疗相比,增量成本效益比(ICER)为 2116 瑞士法郎。在每获得一个 QALY 的成本效益阈值为 100,000 瑞士法郎的情况下,RefluxStop 具有较高的成本效益概率,分别为 100%、97%和 100%,而对于基于 PPI 的药物治疗、Nissen 胃底折叠术和 MSA。确定性和概率敏感性分析为分析的稳健性提供了保证。

结论

这项成本效益分析表明,与瑞士现有的其他治疗选择相比,RefluxStop 很有可能成为 GERD 成人患者的一种成本效益治疗方式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验