Suppr超能文献

潜类暴露的反事实中介分析

Counterfactual Mediation Analysis with a Latent Class Exposure.

机构信息

Centre for Academic Mental Health, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol.

Medical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol.

出版信息

Multivariate Behav Res. 2024 Jul-Aug;59(4):818-840. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2024.2335394. Epub 2024 May 31.

Abstract

Latent classes are a useful tool in developmental research, however there are challenges associated with embedding them within a counterfactual mediation model. We develop and test a new method "updated pseudo class draws (uPCD)" to examine the association between a latent class exposure and distal outcome that could easily be extended to allow the use of any counterfactual mediation method. UPCD extends an existing group of methods (based on pseudo class draws) that assume that the true values of the latent class variable are missing, and need to be multiply imputed using class membership probabilities. We simulate data based on the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children, examine performance for existing techniques to relate a latent class exposure to a distal outcome ("one-step," "bias-adjusted three-step," "modal class assignment," "non-inclusive pseudo class draws," and "inclusive pseudo class draws") and compare bias in parameter estimates and their precision to uPCD when estimating counterfactual mediation effects. We found that uPCD shows minimal bias when estimating counterfactual mediation effects across all levels of entropy. UPCD performs similarly to recommended methods (one-step and bias-adjusted three-step), but provides greater flexibility and scope for incorporating the latent grouping within any commonly-used counterfactual mediation approach.

摘要

潜类是发展研究中的一种有用工具,但将其嵌入反事实中介模型中存在挑战。我们开发并测试了一种新方法“更新伪类抽取 (uPCD)”,以检验潜在类别暴露与远端结果之间的关联,该方法可以很容易地扩展到允许使用任何反事实中介方法。uPCD 扩展了现有的一组方法(基于伪类抽取),这些方法假设潜在类别变量的真实值缺失,需要使用类别成员概率进行多次插补。我们基于雅芳纵向父母与子女研究模拟数据,考察了现有技术将潜在类别暴露与远端结果相关联的性能(“一步”、“偏差调整三步”、“模态类别分配”、“非包容性伪类抽取”和“包容性伪类抽取”),并比较了当估计反事实中介效应时 uPCD 对参数估计及其精度的偏差。我们发现,uPCD 在估计所有熵水平的反事实中介效应时表现出最小的偏差。uPCD 的性能与推荐方法(一步和偏差调整三步)相似,但提供了更大的灵活性和范围,可以将潜在分组纳入任何常用的反事实中介方法中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ad3/11286213/de1387e905fe/HMBR_A_2335394_F0001_B.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验