• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过机器学习在急诊科中合理使用血培养(ABC):一项随机对照非劣效试验的研究方案。

Appropriate use of blood cultures in the emergency department through machine learning (ABC): study protocol for a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Acute Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Locatie VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Locatie VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 May 31;14(5):e084053. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084053.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084053
PMID:38821574
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11149153/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The liberal use of blood cultures in emergency departments (EDs) leads to low yields and high numbers of false-positive results. False-positive, contaminated cultures are associated with prolonged hospital stays, increased antibiotic usage and even higher hospital mortality rates. This trial aims to investigate whether a recently developed and validated machine learning model for predicting blood culture outcomes can safely and effectively guide clinicians in withholding unnecessary blood culture analysis.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial comparing current practice with a machine learning-guided approach. The primary objective is to determine whether the machine learning based approach is non-inferior to standard practice based on 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes include hospital length-of stay and hospital admission rates. Other outcomes include model performance and antibiotic usage. Participants will be recruited in the EDs of multiple hospitals in the Netherlands. A total of 7584 participants will be included.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Possible participants will receive verbal information and a paper information brochure regarding the trial. They will be given at least 1 hour consideration time before providing informed consent. Research results will be published in peer-reviewed journals. This study has been approved by the Amsterdam University Medical Centers' local medical ethics review committee (No 22.0567). The study will be conducted in concordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and in accordance with the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act, General Data Privacy Regulation and Medical Device Regulation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT06163781.

摘要

简介

急诊科(ED)大量使用血培养会导致低阳性率和大量假阳性结果。假阳性、受污染的培养物与住院时间延长、抗生素使用增加甚至更高的医院死亡率有关。本试验旨在研究一种最近开发并经过验证的用于预测血培养结果的机器学习模型,是否可以安全有效地指导临床医生避免不必要的血培养分析。

方法和分析

一项随机对照、非劣效性试验,比较当前实践与机器学习指导方法。主要目的是确定基于机器学习的方法是否不劣于基于 30 天死亡率的标准实践。次要结局包括住院时间和住院入院率。其他结局包括模型性能和抗生素使用。参与者将在荷兰多家医院的急诊科招募。总共将纳入 7584 名参与者。

伦理和传播

可能的参与者将收到关于试验的口头信息和纸质信息手册。在提供知情同意之前,他们将有至少 1 小时的考虑时间。研究结果将发表在同行评议的期刊上。本研究已获得阿姆斯特丹大学医学中心地方医学伦理审查委员会的批准(编号 22.0567)。该研究将符合《赫尔辛基宣言》的原则,并符合《涉及人体医学研究的法律》、《一般数据保护条例》和《医疗器械条例》。

试验注册号

NCT06163781。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1ab/11149153/8dd88400f2cb/bmjopen-2024-084053f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1ab/11149153/45d04caf42ed/bmjopen-2024-084053f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1ab/11149153/e60f8d5aff97/bmjopen-2024-084053f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1ab/11149153/8dd88400f2cb/bmjopen-2024-084053f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1ab/11149153/45d04caf42ed/bmjopen-2024-084053f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1ab/11149153/e60f8d5aff97/bmjopen-2024-084053f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1ab/11149153/8dd88400f2cb/bmjopen-2024-084053f03.jpg

相似文献

1
Appropriate use of blood cultures in the emergency department through machine learning (ABC): study protocol for a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial.通过机器学习在急诊科中合理使用血培养(ABC):一项随机对照非劣效试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 31;14(5):e084053. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084053.
2
Single-stage surgery with antibiotic-loaded hydrogel-coated implants versus two-stage surgery for chronic periprosthetic hip joint infection in French tertiary referral hospitals: the SINBIOSE-H non-inferiority, randomised, controlled trial study protocol.法国三级转诊医院中,使用载抗生素水凝胶涂层植入物的单阶段手术与两阶段手术治疗慢性人工髋关节周围感染的比较:SINBIOSE-H非劣效性随机对照试验研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 25;15(2):e085146. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085146.
3
Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib for Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.COVID-19 住院成人患者使用伊马替尼的安全性和疗效:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Oct 28;21(1):897. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04819-9.
4
PROcalcitonin and NEWS2 evaluation for Timely identification of sepsis and Optimal use of antibiotics in the emergency department (PRONTO): protocol for a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.降钙素原和 NEWS2 评估用于急诊科及时识别脓毒症和优化抗生素使用(PRONTO):一项多中心、开放标签、随机对照试验的方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 13;12(6):e063424. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063424.
5
Diagnostic stewardship for blood cultures in the emergency department: A multicenter validation and prospective evaluation of a machine learning prediction tool.急诊科血培养的诊断管理:机器学习预测工具的多中心验证和前瞻性评估。
EBioMedicine. 2022 Aug;82:104176. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104176. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
6
A prospective, randomized, single-blinded, crossover trial to investigate the effect of a wearable device in addition to a daily symptom diary for the remote early detection of SARS-CoV-2 infections (COVID-RED): a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.一项前瞻性、随机、单盲、交叉试验,旨在研究可穿戴设备对远程早期检测 SARS-CoV-2 感染(COVID-RED)的影响:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jun 22;22(1):412. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05241-5.
7
Safe shortening of antibiotic treatment duration for complicated bacteraemia (SAFE trial): protocol for a randomised, controlled, open-label, non-inferiority trial comparing 4 and 6 weeks of antibiotic treatment.安全缩短复杂菌血症的抗生素治疗疗程(SAFE 试验):比较 4 周和 6 周抗生素治疗的随机、对照、开放标签、非劣效性试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 21;13(4):e068295. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068295.
8
Examining the effect of direct-from-blood bacterial testing on antibiotic administration and clinical outcomes: a protocol and statistical analysis plan for a pragmatic randomised trial.探讨直接血液细菌检测对抗生素使用及临床结局的影响:一项实用随机试验的方案与统计分析计划
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 11;15(1):e090263. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090263.
9
Cryopreserved platelets compared with liquid-stored platelets for the treatment of surgical bleeding: protocol for two multicentre randomised controlled blinded non-inferiority trials (the CLIP-II and CLIPNZ-II trials).冷冻保存血小板与液态储存血小板治疗手术出血的比较:两项多中心随机对照双盲非劣效性试验(CLIP-II 和 CLIPNZ-II 试验)的方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 20;12(12):e068933. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068933.
10
Assessment of the impact of a new sequential approach to antimicrobial use in young febrile children in the emergency department (DIAFEVERCHILD): a French prospective multicentric controlled, open, cluster-randomised, parallel-group study protocol.急诊科针对发热幼儿采用新型抗菌药物序贯使用方法的影响评估(DIAFEVERCHILD研究):一项法国前瞻性多中心对照、开放、整群随机、平行组研究方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 13;10(8):e034828. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034828.

引用本文的文献

1
Letter to the Editor regarding "blood culture bottle shortage mitigation efforts: analysis of impact on ordering and patient impact" by Doern et al.致编辑的信:关于Doern等人所著的“缓解血培养瓶短缺的努力:对订购的影响及对患者的影响分析”
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2025 Jul 11;5(1):e153. doi: 10.1017/ash.2025.10053. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Detecting changes in the performance of a clinical machine learning tool over time.检测临床机器学习工具性能随时间的变化。
EBioMedicine. 2023 Nov;97:104823. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104823. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
2
Diagnostic stewardship for blood cultures in the emergency department: A multicenter validation and prospective evaluation of a machine learning prediction tool.急诊科血培养的诊断管理:机器学习预测工具的多中心验证和前瞻性评估。
EBioMedicine. 2022 Aug;82:104176. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104176. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
3
Using machine learning to predict blood culture outcomes in the emergency department: a single-centre, retrospective, observational study.
使用机器学习预测急诊科血培养结果:一项单中心、回顾性、观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 4;12(1):e053332. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053332.
4
Risk factors and clinical outcomes associated with blood culture contamination.与血培养污染相关的危险因素和临床结局。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2022 Mar;43(3):291-297. doi: 10.1017/ice.2021.111. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
5
Does This Patient Need Blood Cultures? A Scoping Review of Indications for Blood Cultures in Adult Nonneutropenic Inpatients.是否需要给这位患者做血培养?成人非中性粒细胞减少住院患者血培养适应证的范围评价。
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Aug 22;71(5):1339-1347. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa039.
6
Practical Guidance for Clinical Microbiology Laboratories: A Comprehensive Update on the Problem of Blood Culture Contamination and a Discussion of Methods for Addressing the Problem.临床微生物学实验室实用指南:血液培养污染问题的全面更新及解决方法讨论。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2019 Oct 30;33(1). doi: 10.1128/CMR.00009-19. Print 2019 Dec 18.
7
Evaluation of blood culture epidemiology and efficiency in a large European teaching hospital.评价一家大型欧洲教学医院的血培养流行病学和效率。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 21;14(3):e0214052. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214052. eCollection 2019.
8
Prescribers' knowledge, attitudes and perceptions about blood culturing practices for adult hospitalized patients: a call for action.开处方者对成年住院患者血培养操作的知识、态度和看法:行动呼吁。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018 Nov;39(11):1394-1396. doi: 10.1017/ice.2018.224. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
9
Is it time for a culture change? Blood culture collection in the emergency department.是时候进行文化变革了吗?急诊科的血培养采集。
Emerg Med Australas. 2018 Aug;30(4):575-577. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13122. Epub 2018 Jul 1.
10
Revised National Estimates of Emergency Department Visits for Sepsis in the United States.美国脓毒症急诊就诊情况的修订后全国估算数据。
Crit Care Med. 2017 Sep;45(9):1443-1449. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002538.