Federal University of Lavras (Universidade Federal de Lavras/UFLA), Post-Graduate Program in Environmental Engineering, Campus Universitário, 37203-202, Lavras, MG, Brazil.
Federal University of Viçosa (Universidade Federal de Viçosa/UFV), Post-Graduate Program in Civil Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, Campus Universitário, 36570-900, Viçosa, MG, Brazil.
J Environ Manage. 2024 Jun;362:121251. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121251. Epub 2024 Jun 1.
The production of biogas from microalgae has gained attention due to their rapid growth, CO sequestration, and minimal land use. This study uses life cycle assessment to assess the environmental impacts of biogas production from wastewater-grown microalgae through anaerobic digestion within an optimized microalgae-based system. Using SimaPro® 9 software, 3 scenarios were modeled considering the ReCiPe v1.13 midpoint and endpoint methods for environmental impact assessment in different categories. In the baseline scenario (S1), a hypothetical system for biogas production was considered, consisting of a high rate algal pond (HRAP), a settling, an anaerobic digester, and a biogas upgrading unit. The second scenario (S2) included strategies to enhance biogas yield, namely co-digestion and thermal pre-treatment. The third scenario (S3), besides considering the strategies of S2, proposed the biogas upgrading in the HRAP and the digestate recovery as a biofertilizer. After normalization, human carcinogenic toxicity was the most positively affected category due to water use in the cultivation step, accounted as avoided product. However, this category was also the most negatively affected by the impacts of the digester heating energy. Anaerobic digestion was the most impactful step, constituting on average 60.37% of total impacts. Scenario S3 performed better environmentally, primarily due to the integration of biogas upgrading within the cultivation reactor and digestate use as a biofertilizer. Sensitivity analysis highlighted methane yield's importance, showing potential for an 11.28% reduction in ionizing radiation impacts with a 10% increase. Comparing S3 biogas with natural gas, the resource scarcity impact was reduced sixfold, but the human health impact was 23 times higher in S3.
利用微藻生产沼气因其生长迅速、能固定二氧化碳和土地利用需求低而受到关注。本研究使用生命周期评估方法,通过优化的基于微藻的系统中的厌氧消化,评估从废水生长的微藻中生产沼气的环境影响。使用 SimaPro® 9 软件,考虑到 ReCiPe v1.13 中点和终点方法在不同类别中的环境影响评估,模拟了 3 种情景。在基准情景 (S1) 中,考虑了一种假设的沼气生产系统,包括高速藻类塘 (HRAP)、沉淀、厌氧消化器和沼气升级单元。第二个情景 (S2) 包括提高沼气产量的策略,即共消化和热预处理。第三个情景 (S3) 除了考虑 S2 的策略外,还提出了在 HRAP 中升级沼气和回收消化物作为生物肥料。归一化后,由于培养步骤中的水使用,人类致癌毒性是受影响最大的正相关类别,被视为避免的产品。然而,该类别也受到消化器加热能源影响的最大负面影响。厌氧消化是最具影响力的步骤,平均占总影响的 60.37%。情景 S3 在环境方面表现更好,主要是由于在培养反应器内集成了沼气升级和将消化物用作生物肥料。敏感性分析突出了甲烷产量的重要性,表明甲烷产量增加 10%,可将致电离辐射影响降低 11.28%。将 S3 沼气与天然气进行比较,资源稀缺性影响降低了六倍,但 S3 中的人类健康影响高 23 倍。