Department of Psychology, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian City 116029, China.
Child Abuse Negl. 2024 Aug;154:106854. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.106854. Epub 2024 May 31.
This study delves into the relationship between childhood trauma and adolescent depression symptoms, specifically examining the distinct roles of ruminative thinking and deliberate rumination in mediating this connection. The focus is on exploring whether these cognitive processes, namely ruminative thinking and deliberate rumination, operate differently and sequentially in mediating the impact of childhood emotional abuse (CEA) on the development of depression symptoms among Chinese adolescents.
The study involved gathering data from 489 adolescents, with a relatively balanced gender distribution (44.79 % males and 55.21 % females). The average age of the participants was 16.92 years, with a standard deviation of 0.67. Data collection took place in two Chinese high schools, and participants were tasked with completing assessments related to CEA, ruminative thinking, deliberate rumination, and depression symptoms. The interplay among these variables was then examined using a serial mediation model.
The findings of the study indicate that CEA not only exhibited a direct association with adolescent depression symptoms but also exerted indirect effects through distinct mediating mechanisms involving ruminative thinking and deliberate rumination. Specifically, ruminative thinking was identified as a mediator, whereas deliberate rumination emerged as a buffer in the relationship between CEA and depression. Additionally, ruminative thinking and deliberate rumination partially masked the effect of CEA on adolescent depression symptoms in a sequential pattern.
Regarding the link from CEA to adolescent depression symptoms, ruminative thinking is an adverse mediator while deliberate rumination appears to play a benign role. Consequently, the promotion of a shift from ruminative thinking to deliberate rumination is proposed as a promising strategy for alleviating the detrimental effects of CEA on adolescent depression.
本研究探讨了童年创伤与青少年抑郁症状之间的关系,特别考察了沉思性思维和故意沉思在中介这种关联中的不同作用。研究的重点是探索这些认知过程,即沉思性思维和故意沉思,是否以不同的方式和顺序在中介童年情绪虐待(CEA)对中国青少年抑郁症状发展的影响。
该研究从 489 名青少年中收集数据,性别分布相对平衡(男性占 44.79%,女性占 55.21%)。参与者的平均年龄为 16.92 岁,标准差为 0.67。数据收集在两所中国高中进行,参与者被要求完成与 CEA、沉思性思维、故意沉思和抑郁症状相关的评估。然后使用序列中介模型检查这些变量之间的相互作用。
研究结果表明,CEA 不仅与青少年抑郁症状直接相关,而且通过涉及沉思性思维和故意沉思的不同中介机制产生间接影响。具体来说,沉思性思维被确定为一种中介,而故意沉思在 CEA 和抑郁之间的关系中表现出缓冲作用。此外,沉思性思维和故意沉思以序列模式部分掩盖了 CEA 对青少年抑郁症状的影响。
关于 CEA 与青少年抑郁症状之间的联系,沉思性思维是一种不利的中介,而故意沉思似乎起着良性作用。因此,提出促进从沉思性思维向故意沉思的转变,作为缓解 CEA 对青少年抑郁负面影响的一种有前途的策略。