Burger Charles D, Tsang Yuen, Chivers Marie, Vekaria Riya Vijay, Doad Gurinderpal, Atkins Nikki, Panjabi Sumeet
Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Janssen Scientific Affiars, Titusville, NJ, USA.
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2024 May 30;16:447-459. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S460912. eCollection 2024.
Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare and progressive pulmonary vascular disease that can result in right heart failure and death. Oral prostacyclins play an important role in the management of intermediate-low risk PAH. This targeted literature review (TLR) aimed to identify and compare evidence supporting use of oral prostacyclin pathway agents (PPAs: selexipag and oral treprostinil) in intermediate-low risk PAH.
A targeted literature review was conducted. Literature databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane reviews) were searched for studies describing clinical practice and treatment outcomes for oral treprostinil and selexipag globally, published in English (2012 to 2022). Electronic searches were supplemented by manual-searches of targeted conferences (2020 to 2022), and reference lists of identified publications were reviewed. One reviewer assessed studies for eligibility.
In total, 95 publications met inclusion criteria: 47 full-text articles (selexipag n = 22; oral treprostinil n = 16; selexipag and oral treprostinil n = 9) and 48 conference materials. Selexipag and oral treprostinil target the prostacyclin pathway differently; their label-supporting trials had different primary endpoints (disease progression and hospitalization vs exercise capacity and disease progression), differing baseline therapy (0, 1 or 2 vs 0 or 1 baseline treatments), titration duration and dosing (personalized dose capped at 1600 ug twice daily (BID) vs increasing doses over time with no maximum dose), respectively. While both oral PPAs have demonstrated reduced risk of disease progression, only selexipag showed reduction in hospitalization rates. Oral PPAs have been shown to reduce healthcare costs in real-world clinical practice. This difference is reflected in labeled indications.
Given differences in trial- and real-world outcomes, number of prior therapies, and dosing, personalizing the choice of oral PPA is critical to maximizing the benefit for individual patients.
肺动脉高压(PAH)是一种罕见的进行性肺血管疾病,可导致右心衰竭和死亡。口服前列环素在中低风险PAH的管理中发挥着重要作用。本靶向文献综述(TLR)旨在识别和比较支持在中低风险PAH中使用口服前列环素途径药物(PPA:司来帕格和口服曲前列尼尔)的证据。
进行了一项靶向文献综述。检索文献数据库(MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane综述),以查找描述全球口服曲前列尼尔和司来帕格的临床实践和治疗结果的研究,这些研究以英文发表(2012年至2022年)。通过对靶向会议(2020年至2022年)的人工检索对电子检索进行补充,并对已识别出版物的参考文献列表进行审查。一名评审员评估研究的 eligibility。
共有95篇出版物符合纳入标准:47篇全文文章(司来帕格n = 22;口服曲前列尼尔n = 16;司来帕格和口服曲前列尼尔n = 9)和48篇会议资料。司来帕格和口服曲前列尼尔对前列环素途径的靶向作用不同;它们的标签支持试验有不同的主要终点(疾病进展和住院与运动能力和疾病进展)、不同的基线治疗(0、1或2种与0或1种基线治疗)、滴定持续时间和剂量(个性化剂量上限为每日两次1600微克(BID)与随时间增加剂量且无最大剂量)。虽然两种口服PPA均已证明疾病进展风险降低,但只有司来帕格显示住院率降低。口服PPA已被证明在实际临床实践中可降低医疗成本。这种差异反映在标签适应症中。
鉴于试验和实际结果、既往治疗次数和剂量存在差异,个性化选择口服PPA对于使个体患者的获益最大化至关重要。