Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Gerontologist. 2024 Jul 1;64(7). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnae061.
Nowadays people increasingly try to take control over the end of their lives by anticipating end-of-life choices. Explication of these choices is encouraged using advance care planning (ACP). We aim to deepen our understanding of how choice-making processes are lived in real life, exploring the experience of community-dwelling older adults and their close ones over time.
A multiperspective and longitudinal approach grounded in phenomenology was chosen. Ten triads consisting of an older adult (75+) and 2 close ones (n = 30) were interviewed, twice individually and once as a group, over 20 months (=70 interviews). Data were thematically analyzed both longitudinally and from all 3 perspectives.
The essential meaning of anticipatory choice-making processes was described as a dynamic and relationally entangled decisional process, to navigate between paradoxical choices for an opaque future. Three fields of tension were created due to ambivalence in these choice-making processes: navigation between having and losing control, between taking away and burdening with responsibility, and between expressing and holding back oneself.
Anticipation of choices for hypothetical end-of-life scenarios turned out to be complex and ambivalent. Most older adults resisted ambivalence and ignored complexity in an attempt to stay in control over their end of life. The burdening impact of choices on close ones illuminated the relationality of choice-making processes. These aspects of end-of-life choice-making processes should be integrated into ACP in order to better understand and care for people and their close ones faced with these choices.
如今,人们越来越试图通过预期临终选择来掌控自己的生命尽头。使用预先护理计划(ACP)来解释这些选择是被鼓励的。我们旨在深入了解人们在现实生活中如何经历决策过程,探讨社区居住的老年人及其亲近者随着时间的推移的体验。
选择了一种基于现象学的多视角和纵向方法。由一个(75 岁以上)老年人和 2 个亲近者(n=30)组成的 10 个三人组进行了访谈,共 70 次访谈,分为两次单独访谈和一次小组访谈,历时 20 个月。数据从纵向和三个角度进行了主题分析。
预期决策过程的本质意义被描述为一种动态的、关系交织的决策过程,用于在对未来不透明的情况下,在矛盾的选择之间进行导航。由于这些决策过程中的矛盾心理,产生了三个紧张领域:在失去控制和拥有控制之间、在承担责任和负担责任之间、在表达自己和克制自己之间进行导航。
对假设的临终场景的选择进行预期被证明是复杂和矛盾的。大多数老年人试图保持对自己生命终结的控制,因此抵制矛盾心理并忽略了复杂性。选择对亲近者的负担影响揭示了决策过程的关系性。这些临终选择决策过程的方面应该被整合到 ACP 中,以便更好地理解和照顾面临这些选择的人们及其亲近者。